2016
DOI: 10.1111/1365-2745.12661
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of landscape configuration and composition on phylogenetic diversity of trees in a highly fragmented tropical forest

Abstract: Summary1. Fragmentation of tropical forests is a major driver of the global extinction crisis. A key question is understanding how fragmentation impacts phylogenetic diversity, which summarizes the total evolutionary history shared across species within a community. Conserving phylogenetic diversity decreases the potential of losing unique ecological and phenotypic traits and plays important roles in maintaining ecosystem function and stability. 2. Our study was conducted in landscapes within the highly fragme… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
58
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
2
58
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The loss of forest bird phylogenetic richness in forest patches may be related to the loss of taxonomic richness (Carrara et al., ; Morante‐Filho et al., ), as branch lengths are expected to decrease when removing species from the community (Van Meerbeek, Helsen, & Hermy, ). Yet, the MPD of forest birds was not related to forest cover, suggesting that changes in species composition and richness along the forest cover gradient (see Morante‐Filho et al., ; Morante‐Filho, Arroyo‐Rodríguez, & Faria, ) occur randomly or uniformly across the phylogenetic tree, without affecting entire clades (Arroyo‐Rodríguez et al., ; Matos et al., ). Such a result is expected under a context of low phylogenetic conservatism in the traits that confer vulnerability to forest loss (Arroyo‐Rodríguez et al., ; Santos et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The loss of forest bird phylogenetic richness in forest patches may be related to the loss of taxonomic richness (Carrara et al., ; Morante‐Filho et al., ), as branch lengths are expected to decrease when removing species from the community (Van Meerbeek, Helsen, & Hermy, ). Yet, the MPD of forest birds was not related to forest cover, suggesting that changes in species composition and richness along the forest cover gradient (see Morante‐Filho et al., ; Morante‐Filho, Arroyo‐Rodríguez, & Faria, ) occur randomly or uniformly across the phylogenetic tree, without affecting entire clades (Arroyo‐Rodríguez et al., ; Matos et al., ). Such a result is expected under a context of low phylogenetic conservatism in the traits that confer vulnerability to forest loss (Arroyo‐Rodríguez et al., ; Santos et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Species richness is traditionally the most widely evaluated component of biodiversity in fragmented landscapes (Fahrig, ). However, to improve the success of conservation programmes, especially encompassing ecosystem services, we need to understand the phylogenetic responses of plants and animals to human‐induced disturbances (Arroyo‐Rodríguez et al., ; Matos et al., ; Santos et al., ). This is especially needed because evolutionary relationships within and among species may affect ecological processes and dynamics (Cadotte et al., ; Winter, Devictor, & Schweiger, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Other authors have taken a more simplistic approach, inferring likely source-sink patterns on the basis of changes in abundance with increasing distance from likely source habitats [64,65]. For example, in cattle farming systems in the Colombian Andes, many bird and dung beetle species can persist in 'wildlife-friendly' low-intensity farmland, but their abundances decline rapidly with distance from contiguous forest edges [38,64].…”
Section: Moving Forwards: Redoubling Efforts To Detect Source-sink Pamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, Matos et al. ) based on empirical data and model expectations. The previous authors found that the Edge habitat characteristics (microclimate, light, etc.)…”
Section: Examplementioning
confidence: 99%