2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12665-012-1905-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land use classification on landscape metrics based on remote sensing and GIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On the one hand, it is difficult to describe the characteristics of social vulnerability if there were only few indicators, but on the other hand, if too many indicators were selected and used, there were also some problems, such as inaccessible data, complex calculation and poor operability (Cutter et al, 2003;Murphy and Scott, 2014). It is important that the selected indicators are in a manageable level, for which the PCA is a good method to use (Liu et al, 2013). For example, Cutter and Finch (2008) used the PCA method to reduce 42 social vulnerability variables to 11 independent indicators, and studied the temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards using the indicators.…”
Section: Key Problems In Using Index-based Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, it is difficult to describe the characteristics of social vulnerability if there were only few indicators, but on the other hand, if too many indicators were selected and used, there were also some problems, such as inaccessible data, complex calculation and poor operability (Cutter et al, 2003;Murphy and Scott, 2014). It is important that the selected indicators are in a manageable level, for which the PCA is a good method to use (Liu et al, 2013). For example, Cutter and Finch (2008) used the PCA method to reduce 42 social vulnerability variables to 11 independent indicators, and studied the temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards using the indicators.…”
Section: Key Problems In Using Index-based Assessment Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LULC analysis has become a fundamental tool in assessing the environmental consequences of human activity (Hunt and Ditzer 2001;Veldkamp and Lambin 2001;Brown 2003;Dunn 2004;Wang et al 2007;Liu et al 2011Liu et al , 2012). LULC have consequences for level of biodiversity (Tallmon et al 2003), geochemical cycles (Powers 2004) and water quality (Shippers et al 2004;Nouri et al 2009;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Globally, numerous studies are focused on the impact of LULC on the physicochemical parameters of water (Luo et al 2003;Louisa et al 2006;Liu et al 2012;Bateni et al 2013 etc.). But here in Kashmir Himalaya, though there is a lot of information available on various limnological aspects of freshwater bodies (Pandit 1999(Pandit , 2002), yet the influences of changing catchment characteristics on the water chemistry of surface waters are not well recognized excepting a preliminary report on Nilnag Lake and its catchment land use (Qazi and Pandit 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this research, the selection of appropriate landscape indexes was based on experience of previous research as well as the knowledge of the study area when the spatial distribution status and data quality of research area were considered. The slight correlation landscape pattern indexes at both patch level and landscape level are selected to analyze long-term series of landscape pattern change of research area from 1986 to 2026 [25]. The number of patches (NP), patch density (PD), largest patch index (LPI), edge density (ED), mean shape index (MSI), fractal dimension index (FDI), aggregation index (AI), and interspersion juxtaposition index (IJI) were selected when landscape pattern was analyzed in patch level.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%