2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of land use and precipitation on above- and below-ground litter decomposition in a semi-arid temperate steppe in Inner Mongolia, China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the water limitations, MAP explained a higher proportion of the variability in decomposition than MAT. Wang et al (2015) also found that precipitation was the foremost factor that controlled litter decomposition in the Inner Mongolia grassland ecosystem. Therefore, it is not surprising that precipitation is the principal factor that determines the grassland litter turnover time in a water-limited ecosystem.…”
Section: Contrasting Effects Of Mat and Map On Litter Turnover Timementioning
confidence: 82%
“…Given the water limitations, MAP explained a higher proportion of the variability in decomposition than MAT. Wang et al (2015) also found that precipitation was the foremost factor that controlled litter decomposition in the Inner Mongolia grassland ecosystem. Therefore, it is not surprising that precipitation is the principal factor that determines the grassland litter turnover time in a water-limited ecosystem.…”
Section: Contrasting Effects Of Mat and Map On Litter Turnover Timementioning
confidence: 82%
“…However, there have also been contrasting observations that suggested the litter decomposition rate was higher in fenced plots (Haynes et al, ; Lindsay & Cunningham, ). The main factors that appear to be responsible for these differences in plant litter decomposition rates among grazed and fenced plots include differences in soil nutrients (Semmartin et al, ), in the macrofaunal community (Lindsay & Cunningham, ) and in microclimate conditions (Haynes et al, ; Wang et al, ). In the present study, we did not measure soil nutrient conditions or the macrofaunal community.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, litter decomposition at fenced sites can be accelerated by the greater abundance of functional groups such as beetles and opportunist ants (Lindsay & Cunningham, ). Fencing can also modify the soil environment by increasing the standing biomass, which in turn reduces the fluctuations of soil temperature and stabilizes soil moisture by decreasing evapotranspiration (Haynes et al, ; Wang et al, ). Others have found that decomposition of fresh litter of Scots pine (needles) and grass leaves in an area of mobile sands north of Kootwijk (in the Netherlands) did not differ significantly between grazed and non‐grazed sites (Smit, Kooijman, & Sevink, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In August, the mean temperature during the 15 N labeling period was 20.6°C, the total month precipitation was 29.5 mm and there were no rainfall for 8 days around the experimental date. The soils are classified as chestnut soil (Chinese Soil Taxonomy Research Group 2001;Wang et al 2015) and correspond to Calcic Orthic Aridisol according to the USDA soil taxonomy (Soil Survey Staff 1987), with low nutrient levels (Table 1) and a low water-holding capacity (Wang et al 2015).…”
Section: Study Sitementioning
confidence: 99%