Effects of kinesiotaping and exercise program on patients with obesity-induced coccydynia: a randomized, double-blinded, sham-controlled clinical trial
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect of kinesiotaping and a designed exercise program versus sham kinesiotaping and the same exercise program on pain, range of motion, and activities of daily living in obese patients suffering from coccydynia. Design: A double-blinded, randomized, sham-controlled trial. Setting: Outpatient, Cairo University hospitals. Participants: Sixty patients with coccydynia randomized equally into kinesiotape plus exercise and sham kinesiotape plus exercise groups. Intervention: The kines… Show more
“…Sixty three studies were included for data extraction. 1,9-13,15-21,23,27-75 No articles were included through the search in relevant journals, nor through reference and citation screening (see flowchart of literature screening, Figure 1). Figure 1.Prisma Flowchart.…”
Study design Systematic Review Objective To evaluate the efficacy of available treatment options for patients with persistent coccydynia through a systematic review. Methods Original peer-reviewed publications on treatment for coccydynia were identified using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines by performing a literature search of relevant databases, from their inception to January 17, 2020, combined with other sources. Data on extracted treatment outcome was pooled based on treatment categories to allow for meta-analysis. All outcomes relevant to the treatment efficacy of coccydynia were extracted. No single measure of outcome was consistently present among the included studies. Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS, 0–10) for pain was used as the primary outcome measure. Studies with treatment outcome on adult patients with chronic primary coccydynia were considered eligible. Results A total of 1980 patients across 64 studies were identified: five randomized controlled trials, one experimental study, one quasi-experimental study, 11 prospective observational studies, 45 retrospective studies and unpublished data from the DaneSpine registry. The greatest improvement in pain was achieved by patients who underwent radiofrequency therapy (RFT, mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased by 5.11 cm). A similar mean improvement was achieved from Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT, 5.06), Coccygectomy (4.86) and Injection (4.22). Although improved, the mean change was less for those who received Ganglion block (2.98), Stretching/Manipulation (2.19) and Conservative/Usual Care (1.69). Conclusion This study highlights the progressive nature of treatment for coccydynia, starting with noninvasive methods before considering coccygectomy. Non-surgical management provides pain relief for many patients. Coccygectomy is by far the most thoroughly investigated treatment option and may be beneficial for refractory cases. Future randomized controlled trials should be conducted with an aim to compare the efficacy of interventional therapies amongst each other and to coccygectomy.
“…Sixty three studies were included for data extraction. 1,9-13,15-21,23,27-75 No articles were included through the search in relevant journals, nor through reference and citation screening (see flowchart of literature screening, Figure 1). Figure 1.Prisma Flowchart.…”
Study design Systematic Review Objective To evaluate the efficacy of available treatment options for patients with persistent coccydynia through a systematic review. Methods Original peer-reviewed publications on treatment for coccydynia were identified using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines by performing a literature search of relevant databases, from their inception to January 17, 2020, combined with other sources. Data on extracted treatment outcome was pooled based on treatment categories to allow for meta-analysis. All outcomes relevant to the treatment efficacy of coccydynia were extracted. No single measure of outcome was consistently present among the included studies. Numeric Rating Scale, (NRS, 0–10) for pain was used as the primary outcome measure. Studies with treatment outcome on adult patients with chronic primary coccydynia were considered eligible. Results A total of 1980 patients across 64 studies were identified: five randomized controlled trials, one experimental study, one quasi-experimental study, 11 prospective observational studies, 45 retrospective studies and unpublished data from the DaneSpine registry. The greatest improvement in pain was achieved by patients who underwent radiofrequency therapy (RFT, mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) decreased by 5.11 cm). A similar mean improvement was achieved from Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT, 5.06), Coccygectomy (4.86) and Injection (4.22). Although improved, the mean change was less for those who received Ganglion block (2.98), Stretching/Manipulation (2.19) and Conservative/Usual Care (1.69). Conclusion This study highlights the progressive nature of treatment for coccydynia, starting with noninvasive methods before considering coccygectomy. Non-surgical management provides pain relief for many patients. Coccygectomy is by far the most thoroughly investigated treatment option and may be beneficial for refractory cases. Future randomized controlled trials should be conducted with an aim to compare the efficacy of interventional therapies amongst each other and to coccygectomy.
“…The efficacy of KT for pain relief and functional disability enhancement has been reported in several studies 19,33,34 . KT has been proposed as an efficient method for enhancing blood and lymphatic circulation, realigning joints, and normalizing muscle tension [21][22][23] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Current literature provides several options for the conservative management of Coccydynia; non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, ring-shaped cushions, Levator ani relaxation exercises, and gentle massage over the ligaments attached to the sacrococcygeal joint 8 , 13 . Physical therapy modalities include interferential current 14 , shortwave diathermy 15 , extracorporeal shock wave therapy 16 , stretching of the Piriformis and Iliopsoas muscles 17 , coccyx manipulation 18 , and kinesiotaping (KT) 19 .…”
Background: Coccydynia is a challenging disorder that is frequently managed conservatively.
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of adding kinesiotaping versus pelvic floor exercise to conventional therapy in the management of post-colonoscopy coccydynia.
Methods: Forty-two participants, aged 25–45 years, were randomly assigned to: the conventional therapy group (CT) receiving Piriformis and Iliopsoas muscle stretching exercise, clamshell exercise, and seat cushioning; the CT plus kinesiotaping group (CT-KT) receiving additional kinesiotaping; or the CT plus pelvic floor exercise (PFE) group (CT-PFE) executing additional PFE. All groups completed 4 weeks of training, 3 days a week. Pain intensity, assessed by the Pain Numeric Rating Scale (PNRS), and functional disability, evaluated by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), were estimated at baseline and after 4 weeks.
Results: There were significant inter-group variations in PNRS and ODI, where (P = 0.0001) and (P = 0.03), respectively. Differences between experimental groups were noteworthy in terms of NPRS, where the major change was in favor of group CT-KT (P = 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between them regarding their impact on ODI.
Conclusion: CT-KT is more effective than CT-PFE in reducing pain associated with coccydynia post-colonoscopy, but there is no difference in their effects on functional disability. CT-KT is therefore recommended as an alternative treatment option for post-colonoscopy coccydynia.
Keywords: Coccydynia; colonoscopy; kinesiotaping; pelvic floor; tonic spasm; exercise.
“…[37,39] However, when conservative management and injections are ineffective, a surgical procedure is recommended, and a coccygectomy is carried out, which has resulted in good outcomes. [3,34,37,40] However, this surgical treatment is associated with challenges such as a high probability of infection and complex follow-up care. [21] As per research, coccygectomy has a complication rate ranging from 0 to 50%.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patients describe the pain as sharp, stabbing or aching pain in the coccygeal segments [8,33] Pain can be mild but severe cases are reported with agonizing pain that affects the daily functioning of individuals. [34] Previous studies have shown that pain is experienced particularly when sitting on hard surfaces. [1] Activities that cause strain on the levator ani muscle are found to be associated with aggravation of symptoms.…”
Spine fractures are most commonly observed among older people due to weak bones and irregular postures. These fractures of 10 lead to coccygodynia. Women are 5 times more prone to developing coccygodynia as compared to men. Initially, different painkillers, physiotherapy, and other non-surgical treatments are recommended to reduce the pain. However, in case of the failure of these treatments, a surgical procedure (named coccygectomy) is considered to remove the tailbone to achieve effective outcomes. The main aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of coccygectomy in treating coccygodynia (after the failure of different non-surgical treatments) in the context of patients who were treated at Konya City Hospital neurosurgery department, Turkey. In this study, a total of 14 cases of coccygodynia treated with coccygectomy at Konya City Hospital were selected from the period of August 2020 and January 2022. These patients were given different treatments for 6 to 7 months before the operation. Therefore, due to the lack of positive outcomes, a coccygectomy was performed by a senior surgeon. Visual analogue scale was used to assess the pain of the patients after the surgery. Statistical Package for the Social Sciences was used for statistical analysis. The level of significance was set at P < .05. The results of this study showed that more women suffered from coccygodynia as compared to men. Most of the patients had Type I (35.7%) and Type IV (35.7%) coccyx. The visual analogue scale was reduced after the surgery (P < .0011), showing positive outcomes. Ten (71.4%) cases showed excellent outcomes, whereas only one (7.1%) case showed poor outcomes after the surgery, and wound infections were observed in two (14.2%) cases post-operatively. The results obtained from this study concluded that in case of failure of conservative non-surgical treatments for coccygodynia, coccygectomy has emerged as an effective surgical method which is recommended by various surgeons to reduce the pain by removing the tailbone. Additionally, only a few complications such as infection as a relevant concern after this type of surgery were observed, and most of the patients were satisfied with the outcomes and also recommended it to others.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
