2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrep.2016.11.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of isoleucine 135 side chain length on the cofactor donor-acceptor distance within F420H2:NADP+ oxidoreductase: A kinetic analysis

Abstract: F420H2:NADP+ Oxidoreductase (Fno) catalyzes the reversible reduction of NADP+ to NADPH by transferring a hydride from the reduced F420 cofactor. Here, we have employed binding studies, steady-state and pre steady-state kinetic methods upon wtFno and isoleucine 135 (I135) Fno variants in order to study the effects of side chain length on the donor-acceptor distance between NADP+ and the F420 precursor, FO. The conserved I135 residue of Fno was converted to a valine, alanine and glycine, thereby shortening the s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(57 reference statements)
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This positive cooperativity can be explained by the dimeric structure of the enzyme. Cooperativity was also observed for the FNO from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, using NADPH and FO, as reported by Le et al 274 Strangely, positive cooperativity was not seen with F 420 as a coenzyme, as discussed by Kumar and Nguyen et al 253 The kinetic parameters for FO and FOP, however, are similar to that of F 420 (Figure 3.1). Thus, FO, FOP and F 420 are all equally well used as coenzymes in NADPH oxidation by TfuFNO.…”
Section: Steady-state Kinetics Using Fop As Alternative Cofactorsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This positive cooperativity can be explained by the dimeric structure of the enzyme. Cooperativity was also observed for the FNO from Archaeoglobus fulgidus, using NADPH and FO, as reported by Le et al 274 Strangely, positive cooperativity was not seen with F 420 as a coenzyme, as discussed by Kumar and Nguyen et al 253 The kinetic parameters for FO and FOP, however, are similar to that of F 420 (Figure 3.1). Thus, FO, FOP and F 420 are all equally well used as coenzymes in NADPH oxidation by TfuFNO.…”
Section: Steady-state Kinetics Using Fop As Alternative Cofactorsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…This positive cooperativity can be explained by the dimeric structure of the enzyme. Cooperativity was also observed for the FNO from Archaeoglobus fulgidus , using NADPH and FO, as reported by Le et al Strangely, positive cooperativity was not seen with F 420 as a coenzyme, as discussed by Kumar and Nguyen et al The kinetic parameters for FO and FOP, however, are similar to that of F 420 (see Table ). Thus, FO, FOP and F 420 are all equally well used as coenzymes in NADPH oxidation by TfuFNO.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Here, the spectrofluorometric assay of FNO activity was based on monitoring the decrease in F420 emission at 470 nm upon excitation at 420 nm. Briefly, FNO (4 nM) was incubated with 0.5 mM F420 (purified from T. roseum as described in the Supplementary Information) and 0.5 mM NADPH (this concentration was selected on the basis of K m values in other methanogenic organisms 42 ) at 37 °C in the presence or in the absence of increasing concentrations of the compounds of interest in 50 mM sodium citrate, pH 6.0. The apparent dissociation constant ( K D,app ) of the preformed FNO- ligand complex on the NADPH binding site was determined by measuring the decrease in the catalytic activity upon addition of increasing levels of the ligands (baicalin 0–140 μM; mangiferin 0–3.1 mM; β-D-glucose pentaacetate 0–7.2 mM; frangulin A 0–820 μM; ononin 0–950 μM; 5z-caffeoylquinic acid 0–840 µM; ZINC35442308 0–800 µM; ZINC248099510 0–840 µM; ZINC2120951 0–830 µM; ZINC9271779 0–830 µM).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%