2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11738-020-03104-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of iron oxide nanoparticles on the mineral composition and growth of soybean (Glycine max L.) plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results published by Pérez-Velasco et al (2021), agree with those obtained in the present study, because they also obtained increases in the content of micronutrients by applying NPsZnO foliarly to tomato plants. In turn, Yang et al (2020), found similar results when applying Fe nanoparticles plus fulvic acids in soybean plants, increasing the Fe content by 523.93% and Zn by 302% in relation to their control. The results obtained for each micronutrient, with the exception of Cu, are within the optimal ranges proposed by Millis et al (1996), for bean plants.…”
Section: Micronutrientssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results published by Pérez-Velasco et al (2021), agree with those obtained in the present study, because they also obtained increases in the content of micronutrients by applying NPsZnO foliarly to tomato plants. In turn, Yang et al (2020), found similar results when applying Fe nanoparticles plus fulvic acids in soybean plants, increasing the Fe content by 523.93% and Zn by 302% in relation to their control. The results obtained for each micronutrient, with the exception of Cu, are within the optimal ranges proposed by Millis et al (1996), for bean plants.…”
Section: Micronutrientssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…These results are similar to those published by Pérez-Velasco et al (2021), where the macronutrient content increased significantly when Zn nanoparticles were applied foliarly and edaphically in tomato. Similarly, Yang et al (2020), obtained increases in the content of macronutrients when applying Fe nanoparticles in combination with fulvic acids in soybean plants. For their part, , found that applying Zn in the form of nanoparticles improves the efficiency in the absorption and mobility of macronutrients in sorghum plants, especially in situations where the supply of these macronutrients is limited.…”
Section: Mineral Contentmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…In addition, soybean plays a critical role in the global nitrogen cycle through biological nitrogen-fixation. , Soybean roots form symbiotic bacteroids with nitrogen-fixing bacteria in the nodules that convert atmospheric nitrogen to ammonia via in situ nitrogenase activity. , Importantly, the growth, yield, and nutritional quality of soybean are highly sensitive to Fe deficiency as it restricted the photosynthesis and nitrogenase activity . Recently, some published reports have indicated that foliar application of Fe-based NMs can lead to greater growth than conventional Fe chelates. For example, Rahemi et al (2020) reported that foliar application of Fe-based NMs on quince ( Cydonia oblonga Mill.) leaves was more effective (1.34-fold) at alleviating chlorotic symptoms from Fe deficiency than were equivalent Fe chelates .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gobindobhog) From 10 to 80 mg l −1 Nano-scale zero valent iron (20 nm, chemical) Field trial (seed priming) Nano-ZVI is considered a ‘pro-fertilizer’ boosting plant growth and its yield Guha et al (2021) Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) From 25 to 100 mg kg −1 soil FeO-NPs (19–40 nm, biological) Pot spiked soil FeO-NPs increased biomass, antioxidants, photosynthetic pigments under Cd and salinity stresses Manzoor et al (2021) Wheat ( T. aestivum ) cv. Cumhuriyet-75 500 mg L −1 Fe 2 O 3 -NPs (20–40 nm) Hydroponic system NPs served as Fe-source in supporting chlorophyll synthesis Al-Amri et al (2020) Evening primrose ( Oenthera biennis L.) From 0.2, 0.5 and 1.0 g l −1 α-Fe 2 O 3 and Fe 2 O 3 NPs (40 nm, chemical) Suspension for 28 days Germination stimulated in 0.2 g L −1 of seeds Asadi-Kavan et al (2020) Paddy rice ( Oryza sativa L.) 2.5 g L −1 Nano chelated iron fertilizer Field trial Nano increased yield by 27% and protein content by 13% but decreased hollow grain number by 254% Fakharzadeh et al (2020) Sunflower ( Helianthus annuus ) Concentration 1.0 or 2.0% Fe-0 NPs (35–45 nm, chemical) Soil spiked with NPs NPs improved growth plants under Cr toxicity Mohammadi et al (2020) Soybean (Glycine max L.) From 15 to 60 mg pot −1 Fulvic acid-coated Fe 2 O-NPs, Fe 2 O 3 -NPs (5 nm, chemical) Pot experiment (soil; foliar) Plants responded better to the foliar of nano-Fe 2 O 3 -FA than nano-Fe 2 O 3 alone Yang et al (2020) Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) From 5 to 20 mg L −1 Fe-NPs (50 – 100 nm, chemical) Seed priming in potted soil Fe-NPs increased chlorophyll and gas exchange attributes ...…”
Section: Nano-biofortification For Human Healthmentioning
confidence: 99%