2004
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/msf.457-460.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Ionicity on Defect Physics of Wide-Band-Gap Semiconductors

Abstract: We discuss commonalities and differences for point-defect formation in various semiconductors. Point defects do not act as sources of conductivity, and self-compensation is not necessarily more severe in wide-band-gap semiconductors than it is in Si or GaAs. Deviations from stoichiometry are discussed. Effects of lattice constant and size mismatch tend to be more pronounced than trends with ionicity or band gap.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 Self-interstitials and antisite defects are energetically unfavorable in InN due to the small lattice constant and the large-size mismatch between the cations and anions, respectively. 2,4 More recently, surface electron accumulation has emerged as another factor contributing to the n-type conductivity in InN. 5,6 The purpose of this letter is to investigate the relative importance of these three contributions to the n-type conductivity of InN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Self-interstitials and antisite defects are energetically unfavorable in InN due to the small lattice constant and the large-size mismatch between the cations and anions, respectively. 2,4 More recently, surface electron accumulation has emerged as another factor contributing to the n-type conductivity in InN. 5,6 The purpose of this letter is to investigate the relative importance of these three contributions to the n-type conductivity of InN.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%