2006
DOI: 10.5032/jae.2006.04052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Investigative Laboratory Instruction on Content Knowledge and Science Process Skill Achievement Across Learning Styles

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of investigative laboratory integration on student content knowledge and science process skill achievement across learning styles. Treatment groups utilized one of three levels of treatment: subject matter approach without laboratory experimentation, subject matter approach with prescriptive laboratory experimentation, and subject matter approach with investigative laboratory experimentation. A nonequivalent control group quasi-experimental design was used.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
35
0
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
(13 reference statements)
2
35
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research by Myers and Dyer (2006), Parr, Edwards, and Leising (2006), as well as Thompson and Balschweid (2000) support the findings where respondents agreed the integration of academic concepts in agriculture courses would help students with an enhanced recall of material, while the integration of core subject matter was identified as a way to functionally apply math and science skills. The agriculture science classroom was identified by participants as an environment, which reaches a multitude of learners and learning styles, including those labeled "at risk", and therefore integration of academic concepts in agriculture courses will help a larger number of students with academic concepts.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Previous research by Myers and Dyer (2006), Parr, Edwards, and Leising (2006), as well as Thompson and Balschweid (2000) support the findings where respondents agreed the integration of academic concepts in agriculture courses would help students with an enhanced recall of material, while the integration of core subject matter was identified as a way to functionally apply math and science skills. The agriculture science classroom was identified by participants as an environment, which reaches a multitude of learners and learning styles, including those labeled "at risk", and therefore integration of academic concepts in agriculture courses will help a larger number of students with academic concepts.…”
Section: Conclusion and Recommendationssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Studies support the findings that students taught by integrating agricultural and scientific principles demonstrated higher achievement than students taught by traditional approaches (Chiasson & Burnett, 2001;Enderlin & Osborne, 1992;Myers & Dyer, 2006;Parr, Edwards, & Leising, 2006;Roegge & Russell, 1990;Whent & Leising, 1998). Attitudinal studies of agriculture teachers have all provided information regarding the perceived barriers, attitudes, and needs of integrating science (Conroy & Walker, 2000;Layfield, Minor, & Waldvogel, 2001;Newman & Johnson, 1993;Thompson & Schumacher, 1998;Warnick & Thompson, 2007), math (Miller & Gliem, 1993;Jansen, Enochs, & Thompson, 2006), and reading (Park & Osborne, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…This equates to a 30.21% mortality rate for this study. Previous experimental studies in agricultural education using intact classes reported similar or higher mortality rates (Boone, 1988;Dyer, 1995;Flowers, 1986;Myers, 2004) and Jurs and Glass (1971) described mortality rates may be as high as 50%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Myers (2004) noted studies have shown that agriscience students are more successful in science courses than students not enrolled in agriscience education. One could purport an expanded effort must be conducted by all elective subjects to document the contributions to student achievement in the areas of math, reading, and science.…”
Section: Discussion/implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation