2014
DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3228
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of inversion time on inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time (IR‐UTE) imaging of bound and pore water in cortical bone

Abstract: Water is present in cortical bone in different binding states. In this study we aimed to investigate the effects of inversion time (TI) on the signal from bound and pore water in cortical bone using an adiabatic inversion recovery prepared ultrashort echo time (IR-UTE) sequence on a clinical 3T scanner. In total ten bovine midshaft samples and four human tibial midshaft samples were harvested for this study. Each cortical sample was imaged with the UTE and IR-UTE sequences with a TR of 300 ms and a series of T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 2D nonselective IR‐UTE sequence employed similar imaging parameters except the reduced reconstruction matrix size of 128 × 128, five TR/TI combinations (representative TR/TI values = 50/24; 100/48; 200/90; 300/130, and 400/160 ms, in which TI was adjusted based on the measured normalT1PW and was further verified by measuring the decay of IR‐UTE signals, and a total scan time of 6 min). A single‐component normalT2* signal decay would suggest the nulling of pore water and selective detection of bound water . The 3D IR‐Cones UTE sequence employed similar imaging parameters except reconstruction matrix size = 128 × 128 × 10, a slice thickness of 7 mm, the same five TR/TI combinations, and a total scan time of 10 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The 2D nonselective IR‐UTE sequence employed similar imaging parameters except the reduced reconstruction matrix size of 128 × 128, five TR/TI combinations (representative TR/TI values = 50/24; 100/48; 200/90; 300/130, and 400/160 ms, in which TI was adjusted based on the measured normalT1PW and was further verified by measuring the decay of IR‐UTE signals, and a total scan time of 6 min). A single‐component normalT2* signal decay would suggest the nulling of pore water and selective detection of bound water . The 3D IR‐Cones UTE sequence employed similar imaging parameters except reconstruction matrix size = 128 × 128 × 10, a slice thickness of 7 mm, the same five TR/TI combinations, and a total scan time of 10 min.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, bound and pore water normalT2* images and relative fractions can be accessed using bi‐exponential fitting of UTE signal decay . Bound water normalT2* images can be measured selectively with adiabatic inversion recovery prepared UTE (IR‐UTE) techniques in which pore water with a longer normalT2* can be selectively suppressed . However, T 1 of bound water ( normalT1BW) and pore water ( normalT1PW) have not been well investigated using clinical MR scanners, although normalT1BW and normalT1PW have been reported using high‐performance NMR spectrometers .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar techniques capable of short T2* imaging have previously been used in studying tendon microstructure (Han et al , 2014), bone water content (Li et al , 2015), and detection of iron oxide nanoparticles (Wang et al , 2014), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies employing the UTE sequence have shown that both bound water (short T 2 ⁎ component) and pore water (long T 2 ⁎ component) in cortical bone can be quantified using a bi-component T 2 ⁎ analysis technique [18,[25][26][27][28]. Moreover, T 2 ⁎ decay time for bound water in cortical bone can be measured with the IR-UTE technique by suppressing the signal from the pore water and then using a single component analysis of the remaining signal [27,29,38]. A single component decay pattern of the cortical bone in the hip suggests that the 3D IR-UTE-Cones signal is likely from bound water.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is done by inverting the longitudinal magnetization of the long T 2 signal components (i.e., muscle and bone marrow fat) while saturating the signal from cortical bone [27][28][29][30][31]. The Cones acquisition starts after an inversion time (TI) delay, which is used to null the long T 2 ⁎ components while permitting detection of recovered cortical bone signal (Fig.…”
Section: Pulse Sequencementioning
confidence: 99%