2010
DOI: 10.1007/s10750-010-0570-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of invasive macrophyte on trophic diversity and position of secondary consumers

Abstract: Invasive species are one of the widespread stressors of aquatic ecosystems. Several studies document food web effects of invasive fish, but little information is available on the effects of invasive macrophytes. We studied differences in food chain length as well as trophic position and trophic diversity of fish and odonates in lakes dominated by native plants or invasive Eurasian watermilfoil. Trophic position and food chain length were determined using baseline-adjusted d 15 N isotope signatures. Trophic div… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, aquatic invertebrates generally increase associated with water hyacinth invasion. The refuge effect of submerged macrophytes in lakes on enhancing zooplankton communities and the control of phytoplankton has been demonstrated to be positive [26]. In some cases, invasive, submerged macrophyte species have impacted zoobenthos positively but not the zooplankton [27].…”
Section: Implications Within Local Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, aquatic invertebrates generally increase associated with water hyacinth invasion. The refuge effect of submerged macrophytes in lakes on enhancing zooplankton communities and the control of phytoplankton has been demonstrated to be positive [26]. In some cases, invasive, submerged macrophyte species have impacted zoobenthos positively but not the zooplankton [27].…”
Section: Implications Within Local Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trophic dynamics may also be affected by invasive macrophytes; however, these effects are likely species specific (Kornijow et al, 2005;Kovalenko & Dibble, 2011). Kovalenko & Dibble (2011) found that invertivorous and piscivorous fish in lakes dominated by M. spicatum had twice the isotopic niche (or trophic diversity) of fish in lakes dominated by native vegetation, indicating that primary consumers were feeding on a greater variety of carbon sources in invaded communities.…”
Section: Effects Of Invasive Macrophytes On Trophic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Convex hull area provides an index of realized niche space; although it was initially de scribed as a community-wide metric of niche width , it has since been applied at the population level by using individuals as sampling units (e.g. Atkinson et al 2010, Zambrano et al 2010, Kovalenko & Dibble 2011. Bootstrapping (unrestricted random sampling with replacement; n = 50) was used to generate replicate distributions of TA to allow statistical comparisons of mean TA between habitats for each species (statistical power β = 0.70 to 0.99 at theoretical TA differences of 0.5 to 1.0 ‰ 2 ).…”
Section: Trophic Niche Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%