2016
DOI: 10.1111/vaa.12303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intravenous and topical laryngeal lidocaine on heart rate, mean arterial pressure and cough response to endotracheal intubation in dogs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
3
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, the required dose of propofol was not significantly different (P=0.081) between the two groups. This latter observation is in agreement with the findings of Braun et al (), Kraus & Cazlan (), and Thompson & Rioja (). The lack of significant differences between groups may be related to the limitations of this study, which include the technique used for blood pressure monitoring, influence of premedication drugs, the sensitivity of the different scoring systems, the hand injection of propofol and the limited sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, the required dose of propofol was not significantly different (P=0.081) between the two groups. This latter observation is in agreement with the findings of Braun et al (), Kraus & Cazlan (), and Thompson & Rioja (). The lack of significant differences between groups may be related to the limitations of this study, which include the technique used for blood pressure monitoring, influence of premedication drugs, the sensitivity of the different scoring systems, the hand injection of propofol and the limited sample size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Finally, the required dose of propofol was not significantly different (P=0.081) between the two groups. This latter observation is in agreement with the findings of Braun et al ( 2007 ), Kraus & Cazlan ( 2015 ), and Thompson & Rioja ( 2015 ). The lack of significant differences Table 3 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Veterinary Anaesthesia and Analgesia's current peer review questionnaire takes into account many points common to the reporting guidelines detailed above. The editors have the impression that manuscripts adhering to the guidelines have a smoother ride through the peer review and editorial process and would like to thank the authors who have recently submitted or revised their manuscripts to conform to CONSORT or ARRIVE (Campagna et al 2015;Conde Ruiz et al 2015;Nalon et al 2015;Sarotti et al 2015;Thompson & Rioja 2015;Prasse et al 2016).…”
Section: • the Statistical Analyses And Methods In Thementioning
confidence: 99%