2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.accpm.2020.07.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intraoperative high versus low inspiratory oxygen fraction (FiO2) on patient's outcome: A systematic review of evidence from the last 20 years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 90 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5,6 Thus, some uncertainty remains regarding this balance of beneficial versus deleterious effects, and it might depend on certain patient and surgical characteristics. Although there are recent systematic reviews on this topic, 7,8 there are new trials to consider, 9,10 and these previous reviews have not extensively explored the potential effect heterogeneity between trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5,6 Thus, some uncertainty remains regarding this balance of beneficial versus deleterious effects, and it might depend on certain patient and surgical characteristics. Although there are recent systematic reviews on this topic, 7,8 there are new trials to consider, 9,10 and these previous reviews have not extensively explored the potential effect heterogeneity between trials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High oxygen tension is beneficial for reducing surgical site infection and in 2016 World Health Organization recommended that adults receive F I O 2 0.8 during mechanical ventilation under general anesthesia [ 1 ]. However, a more recent systematic review found no difference in the surgical site infection rate according to the intraoperative F I O 2 amount, and suggested a negative effect of high F I O 2 on long-term outcomes [ 2 ]. Other investigators did not find any difference in the degree of myocardial injury between perioperative F I O 2 0.3 and 0.8, and suggested that F I O 2 0.8 is safe for major non-cardiac surgery [ 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The relationship between the F I O 2 level and myocardial injury has not been well studied in patients undergoing TAVI. In this study, we investigated the effects of low (0.3) and high (0.8) F I O 2 , using the most widely studied fractions to compare different clinical impact of low vs. high oxygen contents [ 2 ], during transfemoral TAVI under general anesthesia on post-procedural myocardial injury, as indexed by serum cardiac troponin in the early post-TAVI period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The causes of SSI are multifactorial involves length of hospital stay, patient co-morbidities, obesity, duration and complexity of surgical procedure, administration of general anesthesia, and a higher wound contamination classification [14,15]. The CDC classifies surgical wounds based on their level of contamination, beginning from the Clean class 1 which are non-infective wounds with no inflammation to Dirty class 4, which are old traumatic wounds containing devitalized tissue with clinical infection or perforated viscera [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%