2018
DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000002220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Intraoperative Fluid Management on Postoperative Outcomes

Abstract: Intraoperative fluid dosing at the liberal and restrictive margins of observed practice is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, cost, and length of stay.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
133
1
3

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(146 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
9
133
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Two recent large observational studies replicated the theoretical U-shaped curve proposed by Bellamy 29 in 2006 and showed that liberal fluid management is associated with more complications. 32,33 For ERPs, fluid excess has also been associated with increased complications and LOS. 34 Since there is no established definition of normovolaemia and fluid requirements vary significantly according to patient and surgical needs, there is also a large body of evidence aimed at individualizing fluid management with GDT.…”
Section: Intraoperative Fluid Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Two recent large observational studies replicated the theoretical U-shaped curve proposed by Bellamy 29 in 2006 and showed that liberal fluid management is associated with more complications. 32,33 For ERPs, fluid excess has also been associated with increased complications and LOS. 34 Since there is no established definition of normovolaemia and fluid requirements vary significantly according to patient and surgical needs, there is also a large body of evidence aimed at individualizing fluid management with GDT.…”
Section: Intraoperative Fluid Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As previously described, observational data show that there is a U-shaped distribution of risk with excessive fluid restriction also causing harm, particularly with a significant increase in acute kidney injury. 33 So, during high-risk surgery there is a possibility that a restrictive approach could cause harm. There is also evidence to suggest that in the 'real world' fluid management is significantly more chaotic than in the artificially controlled environment of an RCT.…”
Section: Intraoperative Fluid Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, its implementation into clinical practice is not widespread, and even in places where it is used, protocol adherence is hampered by workload, cost issues related to additional monitoring, and skepticism of clinical staff. The consequence is a large inter-and even intra-provider variability in hemodynamic management [25], resulting in varying outcomes [26]. This issue may be resolved by offering clinicians a real-time decision support helping them to decide when and how much volume and vasoactive agents should be given to optimize the patient's hemodynamics.…”
Section: Perioperative Goal-directed Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a strictly goal directed volume therapy is widely used for resuscitation of septic patients, 30,31 the amount of fluid given in the peri-operative period is often highly variable. 32 As it is known that volume overload will result in worsening of outcome, 33,34 a recently proposed approach to perioperative fluid therapy was based on the idea of goal directed fluid restriction. 35 This approach led to improved outcome and with regard to the present findings.…”
Section: Color-picturementioning
confidence: 99%