1974
DOI: 10.1021/j100615a011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intramolecular hydrogen bonds on intermolecular hydrogen bonding

Abstract: Publication costs assisted by Lebanon Valley CollegeThe hydrogen bonding of phenol, guaiacol, and catechol to the electron pair donors, dimethyl sulfoxide, tetrahydrofuran, and di-nbutyl sulfide, was studied in CCU solution at various temperatures by monitoring the hydroxyl stretching frequency at 3 µ. Only dimethyl sulfoxide was found to disrupt the intramolecular hydrogen bond of guaiacol. The intramolecular bond strength for guaiacol was found to be -3.3 kcal mol-1. All donors disrupt the intramolecular bon… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
21
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
21
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For 2 , our value of K is slightly lower than that of Taft et al , This difference will become less prominent when K is converted to Δ G using the relation Δ G = − RT ln­( K ). Spencer et al measured both 2 and 1-OCH 3 using methods very similar to those here . For 2 , their value was lower than both ours and those of Taft et al For 1-OCH 3 , their value was higher than ours.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For 2 , our value of K is slightly lower than that of Taft et al , This difference will become less prominent when K is converted to Δ G using the relation Δ G = − RT ln­( K ). Spencer et al measured both 2 and 1-OCH 3 using methods very similar to those here . For 2 , their value was lower than both ours and those of Taft et al For 1-OCH 3 , their value was higher than ours.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 59%
“… a This work. Values in parentheses are one standard deviation of error. b Taft et al (refs , ). c Spencer et al (ref ). d Abraham et al (refs , ). e Abraham et al (ref ). f Laurence and Gal (ref ). g Uses phenol instead of 4-fluorophenol. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported experimental values for the intramolecular hydrogen bonding in 2-methoxyphenol include 3.3 kcal mol −1 by Spencer et al 59 and a recent gas phase value of 3.2 kcal mol −1 by Varfolomeev et al 60 The enthalpy difference between e2 and e4 (3.4 kcal mol −1 ) is more consistent than the one between e1 and e3 (5.0 kcal mol −1 ) with the aforementioned reported values. This might strongly indicate that ortho methoxyl groups would most likely be positioned in actual equilibrium structures as out-of-plane substituents, in order to minimize steric congestion.…”
Section: -Methoxyphenol 26-dimethoxyphenol and Hesperetinsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The binding energies became more favorable as the number of OH groups was increased (Figure A). Such a trend could be rationalized by cooperative effects arising from the formation of a linear intramolecular H‐bond network between the OH groups (Figure B) . However, the experimental energetic trend shown in Figure A was not reproduced in DFT energy calculations for the linear binding mode (Figure A; see also solid bars in Figure A).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 98%