2002
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2001.2448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Intraguild Predation on Resource Competition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In ephemeral resources, it is common to find these species in the process of intraguild competition, particularly when resources are scarce (Revilla 2002;Duarte et al 2013). Muscidae species that occurred in this study exhibited this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…In ephemeral resources, it is common to find these species in the process of intraguild competition, particularly when resources are scarce (Revilla 2002;Duarte et al 2013). Muscidae species that occurred in this study exhibited this behavior.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 50%
“…1B) and thus weakens the strength of interactions and the predator reproductive numerical response, which in turn dampens oscillations between consumers and resources, promoting community persistence even at higher productivity (McCann and Hastings 1997, McCann et al 1998, Uchida et al 2007, Abrams and Fung 2010. However, other studies pointed out that Type II functional response alone does not sufficiently decrease top-down pressure and population oscillations to explain the persistence of the IG prey in productive environment (Mylius et al 2001, Revilla 2002, Krivan and Diehl 2005, Rall et al 2008. Nevertheless, Abrams and Fung (2010) recently demonstrated that the influence of Type II functional response on community stability and persistence depends on the range of functional response parameters included in food web models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stability of the prey-only (x * 2 = 1, y * 2 = 0) and predatoronly (x * 3 = 0, y * 3 = 1) equilibria depend on relationships among several parameters ( Table 2). The eigenvalues of the predator-only equilibrium (x * 3 = 0, y * 3 = 1) are especially simple to evaluate and show that prey can invade the system when α, the competitive effect of predators on prey, is less than 1, a result consistent with IGP models that explicitly include the shared resource (Revilla 2002).…”
Section: Noncoexistence Equilibriamentioning
confidence: 83%