2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.07.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intraduodenal injection of Lactobacillus johnsonii La1 on renal sympathetic nerve activity and blood pressure in urethane-anesthetized rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

5
119
2
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
5
119
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These earlier experiments involving dorsal root fiber (18) and vagal nerve recording (42) do not prove that in our experiments the probiotic acted on neurons without first acting on the immune system. Ingestion of the probiotic for 9 days may have altered the immune system in such a way that the neural response to CRD was altered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…These earlier experiments involving dorsal root fiber (18) and vagal nerve recording (42) do not prove that in our experiments the probiotic acted on neurons without first acting on the immune system. Ingestion of the probiotic for 9 days may have altered the immune system in such a way that the neural response to CRD was altered.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 95%
“…The present report may be consistent with previous evidence that commensal bacteria can signal to sensory neurons and reset their excitability state (18,42), a state that can persist even after the bacteria are no longer present. These earlier experiments involving dorsal root fiber (18) and vagal nerve recording (42) do not prove that in our experiments the probiotic acted on neurons without first acting on the immune system.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GF animals are born in aseptic conditions, which may include removal from the mother by Cesarean section and immediate transfer of the newborn to an isolator, where all incoming air, food, and water are sterilized. There is a wide range of differences in brain (and gut) biochemistry (39,57); hypothalamic/pituitary/ adrenal (HPA) axis responses (37); and affective (38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48), social (48,(58)(59)(60), metabolic function, and ingestive behaviors (54)(55)(56) between GF animals and control animals that have normal or pathogen-free flora and were reared by normally colonized mothers (39,40). Thus, observed brain and behavioral changes could be mediated by the lack of gut microbiota directly or indirectly through one or several of the non-brain-related alterations.…”
Section: Gut Microbiota Effects On the Brain: Preclinical Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%