2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2012.07.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of intertidal seagrass habitat fragmentation on turbulent diffusion and retention time of solutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The nutrients in small patches may be flushed out of the patch due to the increased mixing between the patch and the nearby gap. This predicted increase in the mixing level in fragmented canopies also supports the observed increased diffusion coefficient in fragmented canopies under unidirectional flows [ 44 ]. Modifications in the mixing and turbulent processes in gapped canopies may also result in changes in the water turbidity, which in turn may reduce light intensity and the consequent loss of seagrass areas [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…The nutrients in small patches may be flushed out of the patch due to the increased mixing between the patch and the nearby gap. This predicted increase in the mixing level in fragmented canopies also supports the observed increased diffusion coefficient in fragmented canopies under unidirectional flows [ 44 ]. Modifications in the mixing and turbulent processes in gapped canopies may also result in changes in the water turbidity, which in turn may reduce light intensity and the consequent loss of seagrass areas [ 45 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…These can vary by an order of magnitude across fragmented canopies because of the great difference in flow speed between canopy throughflow, and flow over and around patches (Lightbody et al, 2008). This can affect the canopies themselves, for example by varying their exposure to pollution or their access to dissolved nutrients and gasses (Lara et al, 2012).…”
Section: Consequences Of Patch-scale Interactions At Landscape-scalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Distributional and structural patterns of C. nodosa meadows depend on various environmental factors that characterize the coastline such as substrate, depth, slope, lighting and salinity (Barberá et al, 2005;Barquín-Diez et al, 2005;Reyes et al, 1995). However, coastal hydrodynamics may be the driving force that controls the upper limit distribution of C. nodosa, as found in the case of Z. noltei (Lara et al, 2012). Herein, we report on the rare but consistent presence of the common seagrass C. nodosa in several semi-exposed and sheltered intertidal rocky pools of Fuerteventura (Canary Islands) throughout a six-year period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Z. marina and Z. noltei are temperate species widely distributed along the European Atlantic and Mediterranean coastlines, C. nodosa is a tropical seagrass present throughout the Mediterranean sea, the Macaronesian archipelagos of Madeira and the Canary Islands, the Mauritania region, and the Algarve coastline, where it occurs intermixed with temperate seagrasses (Cacabelos et al, 2015;Hemminga & Duarte, 2000;Short et al, 2007). Although C. nodosa can be present in intertidal zones such as sheltered bays (Bay of Cádiz; de los Santos, Brun, Vergara, & Pérez-Lloréns, 2013;Lara et al, 2012) or coastal lagoons (Ria Formosa; Silva & Santos, 2003), its distribution is mostly restricted to the subtidal or lower intertidal zones, and always associated with sandy substrates. In the particular case of the Bay of Cadiz, C. nodosa is also present in one exposed site facing the open ocean, forming small-scattered patches in intertidal pools with sandy accumulations (de los Santos et al, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%