2016
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12670
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of interstimulus intervals on behavioral, heart rate, and event‐related potential indices of infant engagement and sustained attention

Abstract: Maximizing infant attention to stimulus presentation during an EEG or ERP experiment is important for making valid inferences about the neural correlates of infant cognition. The present study examined the effects of stimulus presentation interstimulus interval (ISI) on behavioral and physiological indices of infant attention including infants’ fixation to visual presentation, the amount of heart rate (HR) change during sustained attention, and ERP components. This study compared an ISI that is typically used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
42
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
42
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This attenuated alpha PSD during sustained attention might reflect the releasing of the task-relevant areas from inhibition (Klimesch et al, 2007; Orekhova et al, 2001). This inhibition mechanism provides an alternative explanation for the improved behavioral performance and heightened brain activation (e.g., ERPs) during sustained attention (Marllin & Richards, 2012; Richards, 1997, 2003; Xie & Richards, 2016a, b). In other words, the effects of sustained attention on information processing may result from the inhibition of task-irrelevant areas in addition to the increased brain arousal and attention allocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This attenuated alpha PSD during sustained attention might reflect the releasing of the task-relevant areas from inhibition (Klimesch et al, 2007; Orekhova et al, 2001). This inhibition mechanism provides an alternative explanation for the improved behavioral performance and heightened brain activation (e.g., ERPs) during sustained attention (Marllin & Richards, 2012; Richards, 1997, 2003; Xie & Richards, 2016a, b). In other words, the effects of sustained attention on information processing may result from the inhibition of task-irrelevant areas in addition to the increased brain arousal and attention allocation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infant sustained attention has been found to enhance infant ERPs components subserving different brain functional networks (Guy, Zieber, & Richards, 2016; Reynolds & Richards, 2005; Xie & Richards, 2016a, b). The changes in these ERP components provide evidence for the consequences of infant sustained attention effects on brain activity.…”
Section: Measurements and Functions Of Infant Sustained Attentionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The majority of infants’ information processing takes place during sustained attention (Colombo, ). Infants were observed to be more engaged in stimulus presentation (Xie & Richards, ) and less likely to be distracted by a peripheral distracting stimulus during sustained attention than inattention (Pérez‐Edgar et al., ). Infants also demonstrated better memory for the events they were exposed to during sustained attention (Reynolds & Richards, ; Richards, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Infant HR decreases and remains at a lower level compared to the pre-stimulus baseline during sustained attention. The decrease of infant HR is accompanied by an increase of brain arousal and alertness (Richards & Casey, 1991; Richards, 2008; Xie & Richards, 2016), which facilitates information processing and allocation of attention resources and improves task-related performance (Reynolds & Richards, 2007; Reynolds et al, 2010). For example, infant sustained attention was found to benefit saccadic localization of peripheral stimuli, which is a process involving attention orienting and saccade planning (Hunter & Richards, 2003; Mallin & Richards, 2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%