Effects of interproximal enamel reduction techniques used for orthodontics: A systematic review

Gómez‐Aguirre, Jessica Nataly; Argueta-Figueroa, Liliana; Castro-Gutiérrez, María Eugenia Marcela; Torres‐Rosas, Rafael

doi:10.1111/ocr.12555

Cited by 7 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 38 publications

(70 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Among the different methods used to obtain space in orthodontics, when the therapeutic choice is directed toward making no extractions, one is represented by the expansion of the upper arch, which is perhaps the most frequent orthodontic therapies in growing patients [ 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ], and is also often necessary to avoid other orthodontics and functional problems. Another treatment option is represented by interdental stripping or interproximal enamel reduction, a commonly applied technique used to obtain space to align incisors and maintain alignment in the long term [ 11 ], as indicated in a recent systematic review [ 6 ]. However, this method has a downside: the removal of part of the enamel surface can make the patient more susceptible to interproximal demineralization, caries, or periodontal lesions.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Clinicians can also rely on distalization of the posterior teeth or proinclination of the anterior teeth, according to the clinical needs and the starting situation of the patient. In recent years, a growing number of orthodontic specialists have focused their interests on non-extraction therapy, and among the different options previously citated, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has been widely accepted by researchers [ 6 ]. Interproximal enamel reduction is also called interdental stripping, enamel reproximation, and slenderizing [ 1 , 7 , 8 ], and it is a commonly applied technique in orthodontic treatment to obtain more space to align the incisors and maintain alignment in the long term [ 7 , 9 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction

Biavati

Schiaffino

Signore

et al. 2023

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

According to the literature, interproximal enamel reduction (IER) has become a consolidated technique used in orthodontic treatments to gain space in particular situations such as dental crowding, non-extractive therapies, tooth-size discrepancies, and prevention of dental relapse. There are different methods to realize stripping, and enamel surfaces resulting after this procedure can be analyzed with SEM. The aim of this study was to analyze how different devices of IER leave the surface of the teeth. One hundred and sixty freshly extracted, intact human lower incisors were included in the study, fixed in a plaster support, and then processed with four different techniques of enamel reduction and finishing. Then, they were divided randomly into eight groups (A1–A2, B1–B2, C1–C2, D, and E), each containing twenty teeth. The A, B, and C groups were divided into two subgroups and then all the teeth were observed at SEM. Each digital image acquired by SEM showed that there were streaks on the surfaces, due to the cutter used. The results of this study showed that only group C2 (tungsten carbide bur followed by twelve steps of medium–fine–ultrafine 3M Soft Lex disks) has a few line, which is very similar to group E (untreated group), while the other groups have a lot of lines and show a rougher final surface.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction

Biavati

Schiaffino

Signore

et al. 2023

JFB

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The disagreements were resolved by consensus of the research group. The Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) was used for the risk of bias assessment and the Figure was built as in previous research using the RoB 2.0 Excel tool ( 25 , 26 ). Additionally, the quality of included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Chitosan for the treatment of inflammation of the oral mucosa: A systematic review

Zúñiga-López,

Márquez-Pérez,

Argueta-Figueroa

et al. 2024

Med Oral

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Chitosan is a cheap, accessible, nontoxic, biocompatible, and biodegradable compound. Also, this polysaccharide possesses antibacterial and anti-inflammatory properties. Consequently, a wide range of chitosan applications in the dentistry field has been explored. This work aimed to conduct a systematic review to address the clinical efficacy of chitosan for the treatment of oral mucositis. Material and Methods The design of the included studies were observational studies, randomized clinical trials (RCT), and non-randomized clinical trials (non-RCT), whereas, a series of cases, in vivo , and in vitro studies were excluded. The search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Dentistry and Oral Sciences Source, and ClinicalTrials. Gray literature was searched at Google Scholar. Relevant data from all included studies were recorded. The risk of bias (using RoB 2) and the quality (using Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, GRADE) assessments were carried out. Results From the 8413 records screened, 5 clinical trials fully met the eligibility criteria, which comprised a total of 192 participants suffering oral lesions and pain related to oral mucositis. 100% of the included studies exhibited a high risk of bias. The quality of the studies was between low and very low. Conclusions The results of the included studies suggest that chitosan can diminish pain and improve the healing of ulcers in oral mucositis. However, there is no conclusive evidence of chitosan as a superior treatment for oral mucositis compared with other current therapies. Key words: Dentistry, chitosan, inflammation, oral disease, wound healing.

show abstract

“…The Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale (NOS) [ 15 ] or the Risk of Bias 2 (RoB 2) [ 16 ] were used for observational studies (OS) and randomized clinical trials (RCTs), respectively. The figure of the risk of bias assessment was built as in previous research using the RoB 2.0 Excel implementation [ 17 ]. Additionally, the quality of included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria [ 18 ].…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Clinical Efficacy of Biomimetic Bioactive Biomaterials for Dental Pulp Capping: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

et al. 2022

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recently, biomimetic bioactive biomaterials have been introduced to the market for dental pulp capping. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine any variation between the effect of using TheraCal LC and other bioactive biomaterials for pulp capping is different, as measured by dentin increment and clinical success. The risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias 2 and Newcastle–Ottawa tools for randomized clinical trials and observational studies. A search for relevant articles was performed on five databases. Additionally, the quality of the included studies was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. A summary of individual studies and a meta-analysis were performed. The odds ratio of data from clinical success was combined using a random-effects meta-analysis. The meta-analysis results showed homogeneity between the studies (I2 = 0%). They revealed that the clinical success showed no differences between the patients who received TheraCal LC, light-cured calcium silicate-based biomimetic biomaterial, for dental pulp capping or the comparator biomaterials (p > 0.5). However, the certainty of the evidence was low to moderate due to the risk of bias in the included studies.

show abstract

Effects of interproximal enamel reduction techniques used for orthodontics: A systematic review

Cited by 7 publications

References 38 publications

Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction

Evaluation of Enamel Surfaces after Different Techniques of Interproximal Enamel Reduction

Chitosan for the treatment of inflammation of the oral mucosa: A systematic review

Clinical Efficacy of Biomimetic Bioactive Biomaterials for Dental Pulp Capping: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About