2019
DOI: 10.6090/jarq.53.295
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Interplanting on Fruit Yield and Dry Matter Production in Greenhouse-grown Tomato by IntegratingTwo Different Crop Periods

Abstract: We investigated the effects of interplanting on fruit yield in greenhouse-grown tomato by integrating the first (short) and second (long) crop periods in the cooler northern area of Japan. The marketable fruit yield was similar regardless of interplanting in the first crop period, whereas it increased with earlier planting dates in the second and total crop periods. Therefore, planting immediately after the harvest of the first fruit trusses of the first crop period was effective in achieving a continuous harv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 16 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the monoculture pattern, the growth biomass of F. carica and T. cuspidata under interplanting pattern were significantly improved. It was reported that interplanting can effectively improve the growth of some plants [25,26]. F. carica could weaken the damage of strong light to T. cuspidata under IFT pattern, which could partly explain the promoting effect of F. carica on T. cuspidata growth under the interplanting pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Compared with the monoculture pattern, the growth biomass of F. carica and T. cuspidata under interplanting pattern were significantly improved. It was reported that interplanting can effectively improve the growth of some plants [25,26]. F. carica could weaken the damage of strong light to T. cuspidata under IFT pattern, which could partly explain the promoting effect of F. carica on T. cuspidata growth under the interplanting pattern.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%