2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2016.09.066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of interfacial heat transfer, surface tension and contact angle on the formation of plasma-sprayed droplets through simulation study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The influence of interfacial heat transfer, surface tension, and contact angle on the formation of plasma-sprayed droplets was studied by Zhang et al . 7 . They indicated that the interfacial heat transfer was the key parameter influencing the droplet cooling process and the final splat morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of interfacial heat transfer, surface tension, and contact angle on the formation of plasma-sprayed droplets was studied by Zhang et al . 7 . They indicated that the interfacial heat transfer was the key parameter influencing the droplet cooling process and the final splat morphology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in simulation results of Fig. 9, thermal gradient radially exist between center and periphery for sample I, sample II and sample III, and this can be explained by the composite action of (i) larger thermal diffusivity of molten solder [30], and (ii) differential thermal contact resistances of the interfaces at the center and periphery [31,32,33,34]. In general, with the improvement of wettability of solder bulk through NPs adding into flux and subsequent enlargement of interfacial area, the difference of thermal gradient will be more significant between center and periphery of solder bulk.…”
Section: Temperature and Velocity Distribution In Liquid Solder During Air Coolingmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Owing to the difference in thermal conductivity, as we go farther from the 8090 substrate, the heat dissipation of the coating decreases. This, coupled with the heat accumulation generated by continuous spraying, leads to a difference in the cooling rate of the molten droplets in the longitudinal direction [35]. The droplets at the bottom cool faster and the upper droplets cool slowly, which is borne out by microscopic observation in which a single molten droplet always solidifies from the bottom up.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%