Effects of instructional strategies using cross sections on the recognition of anatomical structures in correlated CT and MR images

Abstract

This research is an effort to best utilize the interactive anatomical images for instructional purposes based on cognitive load theory. Three studies explored the differential effects of three computer-based instructional strategies that use anatomical cross-sections to enhance the interpretation of radiological images. These strategies include: (1) cross-sectional images of the head that can be superimposed on radiological images, (2) transparent highlighting of anatomical structures in radiological images, and (3) cross-sectional images of the head with radiological images presented side-by-side. Data collected included: (1) time spent on instruction and on solving test questions, (2) mental effort during instruction and test, and (3) students' performance to identify anatomical structures in radiological images. Participants were 28 freshmen medical students (15 males and 13 females) and 208 biology students (190 females and 18 males). All studies used posttest-only control group design, and the collected data were analyzed by either t test or ANOVA. In self-directed computer-based environments, the strategies that used cross sections to improve students' ability to recognize anatomic structures in radiological images showed no significant positive effects. However, when increasing the complexity of the instructional materials, cross-sectional images imposed a higher cognitive load, as indicated by higher investment of mental effort. There is not enough evidence to claim that the simultaneous combination of cross sections and radiological images has no effect on the identification of anatomical structures in radiological images for novices. Further research that control for students' learning and cognitive style is needed to reach an informative conclusion.

Evaluation of use of e-Learning in undergraduate radiology education: A review

“…There was no significant difference between the two groups (conventional learning vs. learning by LVO) test scores (P > 0.05) but after 15 days of use significant differences were observed (P < 0.05). Khalil [37] used post test only control group design to assess the computer based instructions for enhancing radiological images interpretation. There was no significant positive effect and further research is needed in this era.…”

Direct correlation of radiologic and cadaveric structures in a gross anatomy course

“…In addition, there is a long-held belief and evidence that mental rotation ability and spatial reasoning are necessary for both radiologic and gross anatomical comprehension (Squire 1969;Squire et al 1975;Folan & de Montfort Supple 1986;Terrell 2006;Khalil et al 2008). Moreover, a series of self-guided radiology atlas study modules that emphasized spatial relationships found a significant improvement in radiology and gross practical exam scores (Phillips et al 2012).…”

Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies

“…Applications of CLT in medical education are beginning to appear 4,5 . Moreover, educational approaches in the health professions increasingly stress the use of authentic tasks, which are expected to help students integrate the knowledge, skills and attitudes necessary for effective task performance in professional life 6 .…”