SAE Technical Paper Series 2005
DOI: 10.4271/2005-01-2082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Injection Timings and Intake Port Flow Control on the In-Cylinder Wetted Fuel Footprints during PFI Engine Startup Process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of port injection, closed valve injection is better than open valve injection, since it utilizes the valve heat to vaporize the fuel easily. This also reduces HC emissions . Thus, the closed valve injection strategy was followed in this experimental study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of port injection, closed valve injection is better than open valve injection, since it utilizes the valve heat to vaporize the fuel easily. This also reduces HC emissions . Thus, the closed valve injection strategy was followed in this experimental study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When ethanol is injected at 540°bTDC, the injection sequence takes place while the intake valves are closed. This injection strategy is denoted as closed valve injection (CVI) [23]. On the other hand, ethanol is injected while the intake valves are open when the injection timing is set at 305°bTDC and 270°bTDC.…”
Section: Experimental Conditionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fuel droplets cannot evaporate in the first cycle of engine start-up because of the cold intake manifold. Mixture formation gets better when turbulence is created in the intake manifold [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%