2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.06.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of initial planting density on branch development in 4-year-old plantation grown Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus cloeziana trees

Abstract: The effect of planting density on branch development was examined in 4-year-old Eucalyptus pilularis Sm. and Eucalyptus cloeziana F. Muell. plantations located near the coast of north-eastern NSW. Branch diameter, angle and status (live or dead) were measured along the entire stem of trees established at 1250, 1667 and 3333 stems per hectare (sph). Measurements of tree height and stem diameter at breast height over bark (DBH) were also recorded. Results showed that with an increase in initial planting density … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
41
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
9
41
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is partly in line with relevant studies on E. pilularis and E. cloeziana [32], where the number of live branches on the lower stem (≤5.5 m height) were proved to be negatively correlated with planting density, but planting density had no significant effect on the number of dead branches. In addition, the increasing competition within stands with high planting densities led to the higher proportion and density of dead branches, as well as lower proportion and density of live branches.…”
Section: Branch Quantitysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is partly in line with relevant studies on E. pilularis and E. cloeziana [32], where the number of live branches on the lower stem (≤5.5 m height) were proved to be negatively correlated with planting density, but planting density had no significant effect on the number of dead branches. In addition, the increasing competition within stands with high planting densities led to the higher proportion and density of dead branches, as well as lower proportion and density of live branches.…”
Section: Branch Quantitysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…While for dominant and co-dominant trees, planting density had no significant effect on their height. The results coincided with Alcorn's [32] study on Eucalyptus pilularis and Eucalyptus cloeziana, where he explained that planting density might affect early tree height growth at stand level, but not for dominant and co-dominant trees.…”
Section: Tree Growth Performancesupporting
confidence: 83%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Plant responses to avoid competition for light include producing low root/aerial part ratios, thinner stems, and strong apical dominance with low branching intensity, characteristics that favor stem height growth that enable plants to grow above neighboring plant branches (KEGGE; PIERIK, 2009). For example, increases in plant density reduce branch size, increase lower branch mortality, cause branches to angle more acutely, and reduce stem diameter (ALCORN et al, 2007). The response of a plant to avoid shading by neighboring plants is initiated by the low red/far-red ratio (R/FR) of the nearby vegetation reflected light (BALLARE, 1999).…”
Section: Taungya System (First Year)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density is more than double the recommended stocking density for other Eucalyptus species of 1,667 individuals per hectare, but the owner's ailing health has prevented him from taking more active management, and he has been considering selling (Galloway et al 2001, Alcom et al 2007. Although the plantation owner is arguably the wealthiest community member, his prosperity stems from several practices, including sugarcane, and dairy and beef cattle, from which he claims to earn the most stable part of his income, rather than the plantation.…”
Section: Figure 3 Reasons Cited For Maintaining Individual Treesmentioning
confidence: 99%