1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0167-6105(97)00284-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of increased geometric complexity on the comparison between computational and experimental simulations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of a k-closure model was made because the transport equations are relatively easy to parameterize and to initialize from atmospheric measurements. One weakness of such a model has been stressed by Byrne and Holdo (1998) and recently Riddle et al (2004) who both found the k-model to overpredict turbulent kinetic energy dissipation for simulations with no buildings. But, as argued in Hanna et al (2004), a large number of obstacles (such as in the MUST array) should produce their own turbulent kinetic energy and compensate for this weakness of the model.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of a k-closure model was made because the transport equations are relatively easy to parameterize and to initialize from atmospheric measurements. One weakness of such a model has been stressed by Byrne and Holdo (1998) and recently Riddle et al (2004) who both found the k-model to overpredict turbulent kinetic energy dissipation for simulations with no buildings. But, as argued in Hanna et al (2004), a large number of obstacles (such as in the MUST array) should produce their own turbulent kinetic energy and compensate for this weakness of the model.…”
Section: Turbulence Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this work employed a uniform velocity proÿle at the inlet boundary with no attempt to model the turbulence, which would be present in a real life application. Modelling of turbulence and shear at in ow boundaries has also been demonstrated to be important even when using two-equation type turbulence models [5]. This has prompted the current Figure 1.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models have been applied widely to a number of natural settings using both 2‐dimensional (Jackson and Hunt, ; Castro, ; Byrne and Holdo, ; Abe et al , ; Nicholas, ; Safarzadeh et al , ) and more recently 3‐dimensional numerical simulations (Lane et al , ; Nguyen and Nestmann, ; Inkratas, et al , ; Shi and Huang, ). In particular the 3‐D modelling approach can provide detailed patterns of flow behaviour over non‐uniform topography (Lee et al ; Lun et al , ; Stangroom, ), enabling a more thorough examination of complex environments such as natural dune forms and their associated airflow fields.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%