1996
DOI: 10.1080/09709274.1996.11907186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Inbreeding on Morbidity: A Study Among Three South Indian Communities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent past, India experienced the large‐scale socioeconomic transformation. However, the existing research on consanguinity is already quite old by now; therefore, the results of these studies is not generalizable any more (Dronamraju and Meera Khan, 1963; Centerwall, 1965; Centerwall and Centerwall, 1966; John and Jayabal, 1971; Beck, 1972; Rao and Inbaraj, 1977, 1979, 1980; Rao et al , 1988; Rao, 1991; Bittles et al , 1985, 1987, 1992; Chakraborty and Chakravarti, 1977; Devi et al , 1981, 1987; Reddy, 1985; Kulkarni and Kurian, 1990; George et al , 1992; Babu et al , 1994; Sureender et al , 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In recent past, India experienced the large‐scale socioeconomic transformation. However, the existing research on consanguinity is already quite old by now; therefore, the results of these studies is not generalizable any more (Dronamraju and Meera Khan, 1963; Centerwall, 1965; Centerwall and Centerwall, 1966; John and Jayabal, 1971; Beck, 1972; Rao and Inbaraj, 1977, 1979, 1980; Rao et al , 1988; Rao, 1991; Bittles et al , 1985, 1987, 1992; Chakraborty and Chakravarti, 1977; Devi et al , 1981, 1987; Reddy, 1985; Kulkarni and Kurian, 1990; George et al , 1992; Babu et al , 1994; Sureender et al , 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The latter category comprises of studies which focus at local or regional level evidences based on case studies, which examined the factors affecting the consanguineous marriages and their effects on pregnancy outcomes, are limited in scope and hence could not be considered representative of the general population (Nath et al, 2004). A large proportion of the existing research based on local and national surveys is not relevant to current conditions because India experienced a large scale socioeconomic transformation in the recent past (Dronamraju and Khan, 1963;Centerwall, 1965;Centerwall & Centrewall, 1966;Jhon & Jayabal 1971;Beck, 1972;Rao & Inbaraj, 1977, 1979, 1980Rao et al 19881;Rao, 1991;Bittles et al, 1985Bittles et al, , 1987Bittles et al, , 1992Chakraborty & Chakravarti 1977;Devi et al 1981Devi et al , 1987Reddy, 1985;Kulkarni & Kurian, 1990;George et al 1992;Babu et al, 1994;Sureender et al, 1998).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consanguinity is an important factor in the appearance of recessively transmitted hereditary diseases and congenital defects [Vogel and Motulsky, 19861. It has been shown to contribute to other reproductive hazards such as sterility, infant mortality, child deaths, as well as spontaneous abortion and stillbirths [Rao et al, 1972;Scott-Emuakpor, 1974;Tanaka, 1977;Chakraborty and Chakravarti, 1977;Reddy, 1985;A1 Awadi et al, 1985;Khoury et al, 1987a;Guz et al, 19891. The risk for birth defects in the offspring of first cousin matings has been estimated to increase to 5-8% compared to 2-38 in nonconsanguineous marriages [Schull, 1958;F'raser and Biddle, 1976;Naderi, 1979;Magnus et al, 19851. In contrast to some populations such as those in Pakistan [Honeyman et al, 19871, South India [Reddy, 1985;Radha et al, 19871, some parts of Turkey [see Guz et al, 19891, Jordan [Khoury and Massad, 19921, and Israeli Arab villages [Jaber et al, 19921, a general decline in the frequency of consanguineous marriages was observed in this century [Vogel and Motulsky, 19861.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many papers can be found in the bibliography, in which diverse factors regulating infant risk of death are analyzed, such as sex (Harpending and Pennington, 1991), parental consanguinity (Reddy and Rao, 1978;Reddy, 1985), twining (Bulmer, 1970), parity (Swenson et al, 1993), birth interval (Brittain, 1992;Hobcraft et al, 1985), or maternal age (Reddy, 1985;Swenson, 1981). The ecological characteristics of a geographical area can also influence the infant mortality pattern.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%