1997
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1997.78.2.939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Inactivating Individual Cerebellar Nuclei on the Performance and Retention of an Operantly Conditioned Forelimb Movement

Abstract: These experiments were designed to examine the effects of inactivating separately each of the major cerebellar nuclear regions in cats on the execution and retention of a previously learned, operantly conditioned volitional forelimb movement. The experiments test the postulates that the cerebellar nuclei, and particularly the interposed nuclei, contribute substantially to the spatial and temporal features of the interjoint coordination required to execute the task and that the engram necessary for the retentio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
3
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some reports indicate that interpositus inactivation produces paw drag, hypermetria, underreaching, slipping, and deficits in grasping (Kolb et al, 1997;Milak et al, 1997;Bracha et al, 1999), which is similar to rDAO inactivation. In contrast, Cooper et al (2000) reported alterations in reach trajectory but no grasping deficits.…”
Section: Rdao Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Some reports indicate that interpositus inactivation produces paw drag, hypermetria, underreaching, slipping, and deficits in grasping (Kolb et al, 1997;Milak et al, 1997;Bracha et al, 1999), which is similar to rDAO inactivation. In contrast, Cooper et al (2000) reported alterations in reach trajectory but no grasping deficits.…”
Section: Rdao Inactivationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In fact, an intact feeding behavior comprises both somatic and visceral components and obviously needs a somatic-visceral integration. During a meal, some feeding-related somatic movement information, such as forelimb movements in reaching and grasping food (Milak et al 1997;Martin et al 2000), may be feed-forwarded from cerebellar deep nucleus to hypothalamus through the direct cerebellohypothalamic projections, and merge with some ingestion-related visceral signals (gastric vagal afferents, glycemia and ghrelin) on the neurons in the LHA, VMN, and DMN. Thus, a somatic-visceral integration of cerebellar and visceral signals that occurs in the LHA, VMN, and DMN may trigger an appropriate behavioral response to regulate food intake, body weight and energy homeostasis and play a substantial role in feeding control.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous reports in the literature relating finger movements to brain region and brain damage [18][19][20][21][22] , stroke [23][24][25] , cerebral palsy [26][27][28] , Parkinson's disease [29,30] , carpal tunnel syndrome [31,32] , traumatic injury [21,[33][34][35][36][37] . However, there are only few reports correlating finger movements and obstetric brachial plexus injury [2,38] and hand injuries, despite the hands are important in performing daily activities [36] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%