Effects of in-vitro or in-vivo matured ooplasm and spindle-chromosome complex on the development of spindle-transferred oocytes

Abstract

To study the effects of in-vitro matured ooplasm and spindle-chromosome complex (SCC) on the development of spindle-transferred oocytes, reciprocal spindle transfer was conducted between in-vivo and in-vitro matured oocytes. The reconstructed oocytes were divided into four groups according to their different ooplasm sources and SCC, artificially activated and cultured to the blastocyst stage. Oocyte survival, activation and embryo development after spindle transfer manipulation were compared between groups. Survival, activation, and cleavage rates of reconstructed oocytes after spindle transfer manipulation did not differ significantly among the four groups. The eight-cell stage embryo formation rates on day 3 and the blastocyst formation rate on day 6 were not significantly different between the in-vitro and in-vivo matured SCC groups when they were transplanted into in-vivo matured ooplasm. The rate of eight-cell stage embryo formation with in-vitro matured ooplasm was significantly lower (P < 0.05) than that of embryos with in-vivo matured ooplasm, and none of the embryos developed to the blastocyst stage. Therefore, SCC matured in vitro effectively supported the in-vitro development of reconstructed oocytes. Ooplasm matured in vitro, however, could not support the development of reconstructed oocytes, and may not be an appropriate source of ooplasm donation for spindle transfer.

Endometrial thickness as a predictor of pregnancy outcomes in 10787 fresh IVF–ICSI cycles

“…The cause of infertility was cat-egorized as tubal factor, male factor, endometriosis, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for thalassemia of both partners, PGD for other monogenic disorders, other or multiple factors (including anovulation and polycystic ovary syndrome) and unexplained. Ovarian stimulation, oocyte retrieval, semen collection and processing, ICSI, PGD and embryo transfer procedures were carried out as previously described (Ding et al, 2014;Khoudja et al, 2013;Shen et al, 2011).…”