2022
DOI: 10.1002/pc.27045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of in‐situ cryogenic testing temperature and ex‐situ cryogenic aging on the mechanical performance of glass fiber reinforced polymer composites with waste short carbon fibers as secondary reinforcements

Abstract: Composite components' fabrication generates vast amounts of fiber wastes. This research suggests using short carbon fibers (SCFs) as secondary reinforcement in glass fiber reinforced polymer (GFRP) composite for cryogenic application. The SCFs (0.1, 0.3, and 0.5 wt%) were embedded in GFRP composites.Flexural test was performed to assess the integrity and durability of composites at in-situ cryogenic temperature (CT), and after ex-situ cryo-aging in liquid nitrogen for various time intervals (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 88 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The addition of more than one type of reinforcement may improve specific properties, reducing the detriments of each reinforcement, for example, the high stiffness carbon fiber (CF) can recompense for the glass fiber's (GF) low mechanical resistance, which can lead to better flexural performance and at a marginally higher cost. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] These FRP composites reinforced with more than one type of fibers are known as hybrid composites, as defined by Swolfs et al [30,[39][40][41] CF has excellent strength and stiffness when compared to GF. [30,[42][43][44] However, GF benefits from significantly lesser price, an important economic factor for mass production in industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of more than one type of reinforcement may improve specific properties, reducing the detriments of each reinforcement, for example, the high stiffness carbon fiber (CF) can recompense for the glass fiber's (GF) low mechanical resistance, which can lead to better flexural performance and at a marginally higher cost. [30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38] These FRP composites reinforced with more than one type of fibers are known as hybrid composites, as defined by Swolfs et al [30,[39][40][41] CF has excellent strength and stiffness when compared to GF. [30,[42][43][44] However, GF benefits from significantly lesser price, an important economic factor for mass production in industries.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%