2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2017.04.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of immobilization, pH and reaction time in the modulation of α-, β- or γ-cyclodextrins production by cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase: Batch and continuous process

Abstract: This study reports the immobilization of a β-CGTase on glutaraldehyde pre-activated silica and its use to production of cyclodextrins in batch and continuous reactions. We were able to modulate the cyclodextrin production (α-, β- and γ-CD) by immobilization and changing the reaction conditions. In batch reactions, the immobilized enzyme reached to maximum productions of 4.9mgmL of α-CD, 3.6mgmL of β-CD and 3.5mgmL of γ-CD at different conditions of temperature, pH and reaction time. In continuous reactor, vary… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The CD increment occurred when the reaction time was increased due to the frequent binding between tapioca starch and enzyme, thus improved the reaction process for the production of CD (Ibrahim, 2013). The results from Schöffer et al (2017) was similar with the findings from the present study on the production of CD using CGTase from Thermoanaerobacter sp. Reduction in the concentration of CD was observed when increasing the reaction time for reaction process.…”
Section: Substrate Concentration (%)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…The CD increment occurred when the reaction time was increased due to the frequent binding between tapioca starch and enzyme, thus improved the reaction process for the production of CD (Ibrahim, 2013). The results from Schöffer et al (2017) was similar with the findings from the present study on the production of CD using CGTase from Thermoanaerobacter sp. Reduction in the concentration of CD was observed when increasing the reaction time for reaction process.…”
Section: Substrate Concentration (%)supporting
confidence: 91%
“…It was shown that increase in surface hydrophobicity led to higher adsorbed protein [ 32,36 ] due to a decreased effect of competitive interactions with water molecules. [ 37 ]…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that increase in surface hydrophobicity led to higher adsorbed protein [32,36] due to a decreased effect of competitive interactions with water molecules. [37] Although, GNP had better uptake of CGTase, its lower residual activity compared to Ca-TMA could be attributed to the larger changes in secondary structures, as discussed in Section 3.2. Also, it is possible that some of the CGTase could be attached within the stacks of graphene layer or its micropores, thus, reducing the active sites available for starch degradation.…”
Section: Cgtase Immobilizationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This finding can be attributed to the favorable interaction between the carrier and the enzyme, resulting in enzyme folding into the optimum conformation on the surface of the PHA granules, thus increasing the enzyme activity [ 21 , 23 ]. Furthermore, the γ-CGTase-PHA nanobiocatalyst was found to possess a considerable specific activity of 347.9 U/g beads (dry weight), considerably higher than that of other immobilized CGTases reported in most recent studies, such as glyoxyl–agarose immobilized CGTase (27.38 U/g support) [ 13 ], cellulose nanofiber immobilized CGTase (159.34 U/g support) [ 14 ], and glutaraldehyde pre-activated silica immobilized CGTase (101.73 U/g support) [ 35 ]. This finding is likely because PhaC dictates a homogenous orientation of its fusion partner on the nanobeads’ surface, hence providing a maximum interaction with substrates and increased accessibility to substrates, leading to high specific activity of the immobilized enzymes if properly engineered [ 22 , 36 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…7 b) in the CDs produced by γ-CGTase-PHA beads was the highest among previously published immobilized CGTases, indicating that the difficulty and cost of subsequent separation and extraction of γ-CD could be greatly reduced. However, the yield (22.73%) of γ-CD was not the highest among the published immobilized CGTases; the γ-CD yield was lower than that obtained from immobilized β-CGTase on glutaraldehyde pre-activated silica (26% β-CD, pH 4.0, 70 °C) [ 35 ] and glyoxyl–agarose (29% β-CD, 85 °C) [ 13 ], but compared favorably with that of CGTases immobilized on other substances, such as aminated polyvinylchloride (PVC) (15.6%) [ 39 ] and resin (FE 4611) (14%) [ 12 ]. When the immobilized γ-CGTase level was further increased, the yield and the ratio of γ-CD at equilibrium were not further improved (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%