2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.01.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of APOE‐ε4 allele load on brain morphology in a cohort of middle‐aged healthy individuals with enriched genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

Abstract: Our data indicate that APOE-ε4 exerts additive effects on GMv in regions relevant for Alzheimer's disease pathophysiology already in healthy individuals. These findings elucidate the mechanisms underlying the increased Alzheimer's disease risk in ε4-carriers, suggesting a dose-dependent disease vulnerability on the brain structure level.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

19
77
1
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 105 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
19
77
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A subset of 608 participants was selected to participate in the present study (http://clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02198586) that was approved by the Ethics Committee of the “Parc de Salut Mar” (Barcelona, Spain; MRI/FBB2014v1.0). A detailed description of the inclusion criteria can be found in (Cacciaglia, Molinuevo, Falcón, et al, ) but in brief, those subjects who were carriers of APOE‐ε4 and APOE‐ε2 , and those with family history of AD were prioritized. All participants accepted the study procedures by signing the informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A subset of 608 participants was selected to participate in the present study (http://clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT02198586) that was approved by the Ethics Committee of the “Parc de Salut Mar” (Barcelona, Spain; MRI/FBB2014v1.0). A detailed description of the inclusion criteria can be found in (Cacciaglia, Molinuevo, Falcón, et al, ) but in brief, those subjects who were carriers of APOE‐ε4 and APOE‐ε2 , and those with family history of AD were prioritized. All participants accepted the study procedures by signing the informed consent.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also performed a logistic regression to calculate the odds of having insomnia as a function of the APOE status while adjusting by age and sex. Potential confounders for those analyses evaluating the effect of insomnia in different outcomes were selected a priori based on well-known risk factors for sleep disturbances and/or cognitive impairment, as well as other variables associated to brain function and/or structure, such as cardiovascular risk factors [34][35][36], APOE ε4 allele carriership [37][38][39][40], body mass index (BMI) [41][42][43], and the level of anxiety and depression [36,44,45], among others. Associations between the presence of insomnia and cognitive performance were first evaluated with a multivariable linear regression model with a p value threshold for statistical significance of p < 0.005 using a Bonferroni-type correction (≈ 0.05 divided by nine cognitive outcomes).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All statistical analyses were adjusted by age, sex, education, number of APOE-ε4 alleles, GADS, and BMI. VBM analyses were also adjusted by squared age (to account for non-linear effects) [38] and total intracranial volume. We did not adjust TBSS analyses for age squared, as we did not found evidence of a non-linear association between age and TBSS metrics in a previous work based on the same dataset [39].…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brain damage associated to AD starts decades before the symptomatic onset and clinical diagnose, which has led to consider AD as a continuum (Dubois et al, 2016;Jack et al, 2018). In this line, studies performed on AD risk population such as carriers of apolipoprotein E (APOE)-ε4 or rs405509 alleles have detected brain differences between these subjects and control subjects in elderly Reiter et al, 2017;Shu et al, 2015) and middle-age healthy population (Cacciaglia et al, 2018;Habib et al, 2017;Mak et al, 2017;ten Kate et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%