Effects of hypoxia and non-lethal shell damage on shell mechanical and geochemical properties of a calcifying polychaete

Abstract

Abstract. Calcification is a vital biomineralization process where calcifying organisms construct their calcareous shells for protection. While this process is expected to deteriorate under hypoxia, which reduces the metabolic energy yielded by aerobic respiration, some calcifying organisms were shown to maintain normal shell growth. The underlying mechanism remains largely unknown, but may be related to changing shell mineralogical properties, whereby shell growth is sustained at the expense of shell quality. Thus, we examined whether such plastic response is exhibited to alleviate the impact of hypoxia on calcification by assessing the shell growth and shell properties of a calcifying polychaete in two contexts (life-threatening and unthreatened conditions). Although hypoxia substantially reduced respiration rate (i.e., less metabolic energy produced), shell growth was only slightly hindered without weakening mechanical strength under unthreatened conditions. Unexpectedly, hypoxia did not undermine defence response (i.e., enhanced shell growth and mechanical strength) under life-threatening conditions, which may be attributed to the changes in mineralogical properties (e.g., increased calcite / aragonite) to reduce the energy demand for calcification. While more soluble shells (e.g., increased Mg / Ca in calcite) were produced under hypoxia as the trade-off, our findings suggest that mineralogical plasticity could be fundamental for calcifying organisms to maintain calcification under metabolic stress conditions.

Calcifiers can Adjust Shell Building at the Nanoscale to Resist Ocean Acidification

“…Two shells from each jar were used for measurement and the average value of these two shells was taken as a replicate ( n = 6 replicate jars per site, i.e., 12 shells used per site). The organic matter content of shell powder was determined by weight loss upon ignition at 550 °C in a muffle furnace for 6 h. [ 34 ]…”

Is Ocean Acidification Really a Threat to Marine Calcifiers? A Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis of 980+ Studies Spanning Two Decades

“…[63] Similarly, gastropod Phasianella australis consumes turf algae at a higher rate under ocean acidification (1000 ppm CO 2 ) so that growth can be maintained. [64] The importance of energy availability to calcification can be further manifested by the reduction in shell growth under energy-limiting conditions (e.g., starvation and hypoxia [65][66][67] ), where seawater carbonate chemistry is not perturbated by elevated CO 2 concentrations. Since energy budget is primarily determined by nutrient or food intake, the slightly increased energy cost of calcification under ocean acidification can be offset when calcifiers raise their feeding rates so that calcification can be maintained or even enhanced (Table 1).…”

How calorie-rich food could help marine calcifiers in a CO 2 -rich future

“…To measure organic matter content, the shells were individually powdered in a pre-weighed crucible and the flesh was removed under a microscope (n ¼ 5 replicates per site and n ¼ 2 shells per replicate). The organic matter content of shell powder was determined by weight loss upon ignition at 5508C in a muffle furnace for 6 h [22].…”