1998
DOI: 10.3327/jnst.35.301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on Intergranular Stress Corrosion Cracking of Stainless Steel in High Temperature Water, (I) Effects of Hydrogen Peroxide on Electrochemical Corrosion Potential of Stainless Steel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

6
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1,2) To determine the effects of H 2 O 2 , O 2 and their mixture on electrochemical corrosion potential (ECP) of type 304 stainless steel, the authors fabricated a high temperature, high-pressure water loop with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) inner liner which minimized H 2 O 2 decomposition and lowered possible oxygen concentration. [3][4][5][6][7] From in situ measurements, i.e., ECP and frequency dependent complex impedance (FDCI), made in previous papers, [7][8][9] the authors confirmed the following. (1) The ECP and FDCI data of the specimens exposed to 100 ppb H 2 O 2 were not affected by co-existing O 2 with the same level oxidant concentration and they were also not affected by pre-exposure to 200 ppb O 2 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…1,2) To determine the effects of H 2 O 2 , O 2 and their mixture on electrochemical corrosion potential (ECP) of type 304 stainless steel, the authors fabricated a high temperature, high-pressure water loop with a polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) inner liner which minimized H 2 O 2 decomposition and lowered possible oxygen concentration. [3][4][5][6][7] From in situ measurements, i.e., ECP and frequency dependent complex impedance (FDCI), made in previous papers, [7][8][9] the authors confirmed the following. (1) The ECP and FDCI data of the specimens exposed to 100 ppb H 2 O 2 were not affected by co-existing O 2 with the same level oxidant concentration and they were also not affected by pre-exposure to 200 ppb O 2 .…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…On the contrary, the peaks for magnetite (Fe3 0 4) type spinel were observed stronger for the specimen exposed to 0 2 than those to H2 0 2 . This result suggested that the dominant chemical form of oxide is magnetite type spinel or maghemite (1, that is the inverse spinel of the magnetite. The XRD cannot distinguish between magnetite and maghemite.…”
Section: Surface Oxide Analysismentioning
confidence: 97%
“…[5][6][7][8] The material used was SUS304 with the chemical composition listed in Table 1. Prior to machining, the material was solution treated (1, 323 K×30 min WQ) and highly sensitized (1, 023 K×100 min+773 K × 24 h).…”
Section: Materials and Heat Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, even though H 2 O 2 con-centrations which are attained in HWC are as low as 10 ppb, the ECP of SUS304 is still a higher value, such as around 0 mV vs. the standard hydrogen electrode (SHE). [4][5][6] This determines the IGSCC environment of structural materials even though the measured O 2 concentration has been reduced below 10 ppb in HWC. 7,8) In order to protect structural materials from IGSCC, new water chemistry control is needed: it can effectively reduce H 2 O 2 concentration or moderate the IGSCC regardless of the presence of a high concentration level oxidant, such as H 2 O 2 in reactor water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%