2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.05.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hunger state on flavour pleasantness conditioning at home: Flavour–nutrient learning vs. flavour–flavour learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The first category consists of the association between the flavour of an unfamiliar food and one that is familiar and/or already has a high hedonic value. This kind of association has been widely studied in rats (Sclafani and Ackroff, 1994;Weingarten, 1994 and and humans (Mobini et al, 2007;Brunstrom and Fletcher, 2008). In contrast, flavour-nutrient conditioning is induced by pairing the flavour of an unfamiliar food with an energy supply, thats is, positive post-ingestive consequences (Myers and Sclafani, 2006).…”
Section: Characteristics and Development Of Preferences And Aversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The first category consists of the association between the flavour of an unfamiliar food and one that is familiar and/or already has a high hedonic value. This kind of association has been widely studied in rats (Sclafani and Ackroff, 1994;Weingarten, 1994 and and humans (Mobini et al, 2007;Brunstrom and Fletcher, 2008). In contrast, flavour-nutrient conditioning is induced by pairing the flavour of an unfamiliar food with an energy supply, thats is, positive post-ingestive consequences (Myers and Sclafani, 2006).…”
Section: Characteristics and Development Of Preferences And Aversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, flavour-nutrient conditioning is induced by pairing the flavour of an unfamiliar food with an energy supply, thats is, positive post-ingestive consequences (Myers and Sclafani, 2006). Flavour-nutrient learning has been studied in humans (Brunstrom and Mitchell, 2007;Mobini et al, 2007;Zeinstra et al, 2009) and rats (Sclafani and Ackroff, 1994;Warwick and Weingarten, 1994;Lucas et al, 1997;Lucas and Sclafani, 1998;Sclafani, 2001). Although they are often combined, the ingestion of highly palatable food (e.g.…”
Section: Characteristics and Development Of Preferences And Aversionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most well-known postingestive consequences that have been shown to condition young children's preferences for and aversions to flavors, foods or drinks are the sensation of satiety, derived from the nutritive effects of ingested energy, a positive reinforce for those preferences (Birch, 1992;Birch, 1999), and nausea and emesis, negative reinforces (Rozin & Fallon, 1987;Birch, 1999), respectively. When acquisition of flavor or food preferences is based on the pleasant nutritive effects of ingested energy, then the terms flavor-nutrient learning or flavor-nutrient conditioning are used to designate that process (Appleton, Gentry, & Sheperd, 2006;Mobini, Chambers & Yeomans, 2007;Zeinstra, Koelen, Kok, & De Graaf, 2009). In other cases, neutral flavors or foods have been contingently paired with an already liked or disliked flavor/food, thus leading to increases or decreases in liking for flavors, respectively.…”
Section: Young Children's Conditioned Preferences For or Aversions Tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Odours paired with metabolic value can become liked even when the taste is unpleasant, which explains how we can develop strong preferences for bitter drinks such as coffee or beer, or 'painful' foods that contain chilli. While these two learning processes are seemingly similar, they can be dissociated by, for example, conditioning liking for an odour paired with a non-nutritive sweetener such as aspartame or alternatively pairing the odour with energy in the form of sugar, but under conditions of satiety, in which case the amount of increased liking is limited [10].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%