2018
DOI: 10.1111/pops.12535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Humor on Intergroup Communication in Intractable Conflicts: Using Humor in an Intergroup Appeal Facilitates Stronger Agreement Between Groups and a Greater Willingness to Compromise

Abstract: Overcoming sociopsychological barriers within intergroup communications may bring forth new, practical methods for conflict resolution, particularly crucial for groups engulfed by intractable conflict. This article examines the use of humor—an extremely effective technique of persuasive communication—as one potential route whose potency in resolving intractable conflicts has thus far been neglected. In Study 1, Palestinians who read a message from an “Israeli representative” (conveying the Israeli narrative of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 38 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One common approach used by practitioners is reducing intergroup dehumanization with humor. While humor has been utilized and tested in various domains to shift attitudes (e.g., politics; e.g., Innocenti & Miller, 2016; marketing; e.g., Beard, 2005; business; e.g., Cooper, 2005; education; e.g., Fata et al, 2018), its potential to improve intergroup relations has been underexplored by researchers despite Gordon Allport referring to humor as the “missing ingredient” (1954, p. 437) in the prejudice puzzle (for a notable exception, see Nir & Halperin, 2019). Why might humor be an effective persuasion tool in interventions designed to improve intergroup relations?…”
Section: Research On Dehumanization and How To Combat Itmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One common approach used by practitioners is reducing intergroup dehumanization with humor. While humor has been utilized and tested in various domains to shift attitudes (e.g., politics; e.g., Innocenti & Miller, 2016; marketing; e.g., Beard, 2005; business; e.g., Cooper, 2005; education; e.g., Fata et al, 2018), its potential to improve intergroup relations has been underexplored by researchers despite Gordon Allport referring to humor as the “missing ingredient” (1954, p. 437) in the prejudice puzzle (for a notable exception, see Nir & Halperin, 2019). Why might humor be an effective persuasion tool in interventions designed to improve intergroup relations?…”
Section: Research On Dehumanization and How To Combat Itmentioning
confidence: 99%