2005
DOI: 10.2193/0022-541x(2005)69[1683:eohdou]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Human Disturbance on Use of Space and Flight Distance of Mountain Gazelles

Abstract: We studied the impact of proximity to human concentrations, hikers, and field vehicles on mountain gazelles (Gazella gazella gazella) space-use patterns, flight distance, and visibility in the southern coastal plain of Israel. We collected data on gazelle behavior and human disturbance from fixed observation sites, drive counts, and pellet counts. The density of pellets was positively correlated with the distance to human concentrations, and the flight distance was positively correlated with human disturbance … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many wildlife species avoid areas with human activities, displacing such species into less suitable habitats, or negatively affecting the amount of time spent on parental care, foraging, resting and mating displays (Brubaker & Coss, , ; Burger, ; Gander & Ingold, ; Klein, Humphrey, & Percival, ; Manor, Saltz, & McCorquodale, ). However, certain species seemingly thrive within human‐altered habitats and can adapt to survive in urban environments by directly or indirectly increasing their fitness through exploiting human‐induced resources and benefits such as cultivated plants, garbage, decreased predation pressure and shelter (Kark, Iwaniuk, Schalimtzek, & Banker, ; McKinney, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many wildlife species avoid areas with human activities, displacing such species into less suitable habitats, or negatively affecting the amount of time spent on parental care, foraging, resting and mating displays (Brubaker & Coss, , ; Burger, ; Gander & Ingold, ; Klein, Humphrey, & Percival, ; Manor, Saltz, & McCorquodale, ). However, certain species seemingly thrive within human‐altered habitats and can adapt to survive in urban environments by directly or indirectly increasing their fitness through exploiting human‐induced resources and benefits such as cultivated plants, garbage, decreased predation pressure and shelter (Kark, Iwaniuk, Schalimtzek, & Banker, ; McKinney, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies have compared the distribution patterns of animals with those of humans in areas used for recreation (Nellemann et al 2000;Jayakody 2005;Manor and Saltz 2005;Galanti et al 2006;George and Crooks 2006). In this study, our approach was to look at the direct consequences of recreational disturbance by tracking animals with GPS (Global Positioning System) collars.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This behavior is seen in many animal species, primarily mammals and birds [5,6] although evidence is almost null among primates or is based on anecdotal or tangential observations [7,8]. Moreover, a growing number of studies state that many antipredator behaviors that are deployed in natural habitats are also observed in humanized environments [9][10][11][12][13][14] in which human presence triggers analogue responses in animals to those exhibited with natural predators [9]. Thus, the human influence on animal behavior can be examined in terms of the predatory dynamic, separately considering the factors involved, such as minimizing time investments in risk areas, the optimal feeding time, anti-predator vigilance and/or the decrease/increase of specific behaviors depending on the perceived risk [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%