2014
DOI: 10.2478/ijnaoe-2013-0206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hull form parameters on seakeeping for YTU gulet series with cruiser stern

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Simple linear regression establishes a linear relationship between two variables, whereas nonlinear regression establishes nonlinear correlations [34]. Cakici and Aydin used a nonlinear regression method for ship design and prediction [35]. The model's objective is to minimize the residual sum of squares (RSS), a measure of the variance between the observations of Y and the nonlinear function used to forecast Y.…”
Section: Nonlinear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple linear regression establishes a linear relationship between two variables, whereas nonlinear regression establishes nonlinear correlations [34]. Cakici and Aydin used a nonlinear regression method for ship design and prediction [35]. The model's objective is to minimize the residual sum of squares (RSS), a measure of the variance between the observations of Y and the nonlinear function used to forecast Y.…”
Section: Nonlinear Regressionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, many simplified approaches have been proposed, based on multivariate regression analysis. These approaches to predictive models range from approximate prediction of seakeeping qualities for conventional merchant ships (Loukakis & Chryssostomidis, 1975;Moor & Murdey, 1968) and gulets (Cakici & Aydin, 2014), to generation of design charts (Hearn et al, 1991) and to application of different forms of seakeeping rank (Kishev, 1992;McCreight, 1983;Nabergoj et al, 2003;Trincas et al, 2001;Walden & Grundmann, 1985;Wijngaarden, 1984;Zborowski & Shiaw-Jyh, 1992) to identify the comparative merit of alternative hull forms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following that study, a lot of related studies have been carried out. For example, Sayli [3] and Cakici [4] recently proposed a data analysis approach to extract the dominant hull-form parameters and their influence from a ship motion database. Apart from these studies, Jensen [5,6] proposed a semi-analytical approach to develop simplified formulae of wave-induced ship motion and a VBM that is based on the strip theory, which explicitly includes the hull-form shape parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study is based on the following fundamental idea: the ship response in waves is mainly dominated by the broad topography of the ship and minor modifications of hull-form are secondary [13]. This fact is generally accepted, and this allows a rough estimation of the seakeeping performance or wave loads in the early design phase where the bodylines have not been determined [2][3][4][5][6]. Furthermore, this study focused on not only the simplicity but also the physical meaning of hull-form parameters.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%