2001
DOI: 10.1080/09537320120070149
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Household Consumption Patterns on CO2Requirements

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

7
112
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
7
112
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the PET model, urbanization has effects on labor supply and consumption preferences and therefore on economic growth and income. Some other analyses of the effect of urbanization on energy use or emissions abstract from any income effects and aim to measure the effect only of differences in lifestyles or consumption patterns (24)(25)(26). Thus, differences in conclusions about the effect of urbanization can be caused in large part by differences in the definition of urbanization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the PET model, urbanization has effects on labor supply and consumption preferences and therefore on economic growth and income. Some other analyses of the effect of urbanization on energy use or emissions abstract from any income effects and aim to measure the effect only of differences in lifestyles or consumption patterns (24)(25)(26). Thus, differences in conclusions about the effect of urbanization can be caused in large part by differences in the definition of urbanization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, to reduce the power of this assumption, other explanatory variables are added to one household demand model to reduce the burden of income determinism. These are number of persons in the household, degree of urbanity, state, age of reference person, and dwelling type, which have all previously been observed to be significant factors in determining household consumption patterns (Wier et al, 2001;Lenzen et al, 2004;Vringer et al, 2007).…”
Section: Environmental Concern and Other Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…We employ the EASI demand 2 Utilising between-country heterogeneity, studies find affluence, measured as income or final demand, to be the principle driver of material footprints (Wiedmann et al, 2015;Pothen, 2017;Pothen and Welsch, 2017) 3 The energy footprint of households, also known as energy requirements, has been estimated since the 1970s (Herendeen and Tanaka, 1976;Herendeen, 1978). Other studies on energy and carbon footprints of households include Wier et al (2001) for Denmark, Weber and Matthews (2008) for the USA, Druckman and Jackson (2009) and Baiocchi et al (2010) for the UK, Girod and De Haan (2010) for Switzerland, Steen-Olsen et al (2016) for Norway, and Lenzen et al (2006) for Australia, Brazil, Denmark, India as well as Japan. Hertwich (2005) provides an overview.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%