2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2006.11.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of host plant species on fitness costs of Bt resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

4
79
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 79 publications
(86 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
4
79
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our Þnding here that entomopathogenic nematodes can increase the Þtness cost of Bt resistance complements past work demonstrating ecological factors such as host plants Myers 2005, Bird andAkhurst 2007), competition (Higginson et al 2005, Raymond et al 2005, and viruses (Raymond et al 2007a) can increase the Þtness cost of resistance to Bt. From the perspective of resistance management, these results are important because they point to an opportunity to design refuges to magnify Þtness costs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our Þnding here that entomopathogenic nematodes can increase the Þtness cost of Bt resistance complements past work demonstrating ecological factors such as host plants Myers 2005, Bird andAkhurst 2007), competition (Higginson et al 2005, Raymond et al 2005, and viruses (Raymond et al 2007a) can increase the Þtness cost of resistance to Bt. From the perspective of resistance management, these results are important because they point to an opportunity to design refuges to magnify Þtness costs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…2b). Typically, Þtness costs affecting rs individuals are accompanied by lower Þtness for homozygous resistant (rr) individuals (Carriè re et al 2001(Carriè re et al , 2004Bird and Akhurst 2004; Huang et al 2005;Bird and Akhurst 2007), although some studies have reported Þtness costs only affecting rs individuals Wright 2001, Janmaat andMyers 2005). We do not know why a cost affecting only rs individuals was found for SAF97-H4.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fitness costs can enhance the effectiveness of refuges to delay resistance (Gassmann et al 2009a, Carriè re et al 2010. Evidence from laboratory experiments suggests that Þtness costs of Bt resistance can be increased by several ecological factors including host plant species (Janmaat andMyers 2005, Bird andAkhurst 2007), density (Raymond et al 2005), entomopathogens (Raymond et al 2007, and competition for mates (Higginson et al 2005). In addition, laboratory selection experiments have demonstrated the value of refuges in delaying resistance to Bt (Tang et al 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, in a Bt cropping system, the purpose of the refuge is primarily to supply susceptible pests to mate with resistant insects. However, some of the same components of IPM such as biological control and host plant resistance also may act to increase Þtness costs of Bt resistance (Janmaat and Myers 2005, Bird and Akhurst 2007, Raymond et al 2007. The ability of such ecological factors to increase Þtness costs is referred to as ecological negative crossresistance (Pittendrigh et al 2008, Gassmann et al 2009c.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%