2008
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2311.2008.01000.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of host‐plant shift on immune and other key life‐history traits of an eruptive Geometrid, Epirrita autumnata (Borkhausen)

Abstract: 1. Population density of Epirrita autumnata (Lepidoptera: Geometridae) reaches outbreak densities regularly in northernmost Scandinavia. During these outbreak years, the most abundant host species, the mountain birch (Betula pubescens ssp. czerepanovii), is regularly exhausted, although larvae may rescue themselves from starvation by using alternative host species. 2. In this paper, the effects of the shift of host species on the immune defence and other life‐history traits of E. autumnata were investigated, a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, in the horned beetles, Euoniticellus intermedius Reiche, and in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor L., it has been found that larger individuals have a stronger encapsulation response (Rantala et al, 2002;Pomfrey & Knell, 2006). Likewise, studies in moths have not found any association between size and encapsulation response (e.g., Ojala et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2008;Mikkola & Rantala, 2010;Ruuhola et al, 2010). In another ant species, Formica aquilonia Yarrow, Sorvari et al (2008) did not find any association between size and immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…In contrast, in the horned beetles, Euoniticellus intermedius Reiche, and in the mealworm beetle, Tenebrio molitor L., it has been found that larger individuals have a stronger encapsulation response (Rantala et al, 2002;Pomfrey & Knell, 2006). Likewise, studies in moths have not found any association between size and encapsulation response (e.g., Ojala et al, 2005;Yang et al, 2008;Mikkola & Rantala, 2010;Ruuhola et al, 2010). In another ant species, Formica aquilonia Yarrow, Sorvari et al (2008) did not find any association between size and immunity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Two results from the above experiments support the latter explanation. Firstly, injection assays showed that there was no detrimental effect of PAs on immune performance, and secondly, parasitized caterpillars in the host plant choice experiment showed increased consumption of alternative (Ojala et al 2005;Yang et al 2008;Smilanich et al 2009a). For example, in the arctiid caterpillar Parasemia plantaginis, immunity is highest when feeding on plants that have high concentrations of antioxidants (Ojala et al 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Nutrients (e.g., protein) can enhance encapsulation and lysozyme-like antibacterial activity, while other immune system components like phenoloxidase activity may not be affected (Lee et al 2006(Lee et al , 2008Povey et al 2009;Srygley et al 2009). Ingestion of certain plant secondary metabolites (e.g., iridoid glycosides) can diminish the immune response by directly interfering with melanization (Smilanich et al 2009a), whereas other metabolites (e.g., hydrolyzable tannins) may act indirectly on immunity via reductions in herbivore performance (i.e., declines in host quality from the perspective of the parasitoid) (Haviola et al 2007;Yang et al 2008). Alternatively, antioxidant activity associated with carotenoids, phenolics, and synthetic chemicals can enhance insect immunity by putatively reducing harmful oxygen species (Ojala et al 2005;Buyukguzel 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quality of food can also impact fecundity and egg parameters (Rossiter 1991b, Rö der et al 2008, Yang et al 2008. Nutrients supplied by mothers to eggs inßuence egg provisions and ultimately offspring performance and survival.…”
Section: Fig 2 Glucose (A) Glycogen (B)mentioning
confidence: 99%