2021
DOI: 10.1089/zeb.2021.0018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Holding Density on the Welfare of Zebrafish: A Systematic Review

Abstract: The zebrafish is becoming an increasingly popular research animal around the world. Its welfare is affected by an array of environmental factors, such as food access and water quality. Holding density is an important welfare aspect, not least due to its interaction with other housing conditions. Despite the extensive use of zebrafish in research, little is known of how densities affect its welfare. In this systematic review, we have performed a large literature search, compiled, and evaluated all publications … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(74 reference statements)
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sporadic studies have already started to imply that housing zebrafish in the standard manner may have deleterious consequences ( Ramsay et al, 2006 ; Reed and Jennings, 2011 ; Parker et al, 2012 ; Pavlidis et al, 2013 ; Lindsey and Tropepe, 2014 ; Shams et al, 2015 , 2017a , b ; Movva et al, 2017 ; Maierdiyali et al, 2020 ; Stevens et al, 2021 ). Surprisingly, despite the increasing popularity and frequent use of zebrafish in biomedical research, little is known about what constitutes an optimal housing environment for these fish in the laboratory, and no systematic analysis has been performed to address this question ( Ramsay et al, 2006 ; Reed and Jennings, 2011 ; Andersson and Kettunen, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sporadic studies have already started to imply that housing zebrafish in the standard manner may have deleterious consequences ( Ramsay et al, 2006 ; Reed and Jennings, 2011 ; Parker et al, 2012 ; Pavlidis et al, 2013 ; Lindsey and Tropepe, 2014 ; Shams et al, 2015 , 2017a , b ; Movva et al, 2017 ; Maierdiyali et al, 2020 ; Stevens et al, 2021 ). Surprisingly, despite the increasing popularity and frequent use of zebrafish in biomedical research, little is known about what constitutes an optimal housing environment for these fish in the laboratory, and no systematic analysis has been performed to address this question ( Ramsay et al, 2006 ; Reed and Jennings, 2011 ; Andersson and Kettunen, 2021 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes to animal care can impact animal behavior and therefore influence the reproducibility of behavioral studies 10, 45, 46 . To determine whether our changes in animal care could impact behavior, we utilized standard protocols for published behavioral assays at the individual and group level 32, 47 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Albeit the initial fish stocks in our study were in between these numbers (eight per species), it nevertheless will be a reasonable idea to follow such scientifically verified outlines in future research on small ornamentals (especially when studying community aquaria), which means keeping the fish in groups of 10+ individuals of each species. It needs to be considered, however, that larger tanks will likely be required to avoid overcrowding, as this may cause stress and anxiety, and often accelerates the onset of diseases [ 86 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In ornamental fish, it is known that excessive stocking density may increase the risk of body deformation, but only at very high numbers, typically found in zebrafish housing systems of research facilities rather than in regular aquaria or even wholesaler tanks (above 12 fish L −1 ) [ 86 ]. Meanwhile, aquaculture research shows that skeletal deformities are relatively frequent in some farmed fish species [ 73 ] and can be prompted by a number of reasons [ 74 ], although improper nutrition remains to be the main causative factor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%