Education seems always to be in the midst of a crisis-or even simultaneously in several. One of those in which it is involved just now does nothappily-particularly concern science education. But although the heat has been generated in the social and political areas there is no telling when the fever will spread to others. It came to a head in the recent "Pasadena incident," the details of which need not be recounted. A superintendent was brought in to reorganize and improve the school system. He proved too "progressive" for his constituency; the principal complaint was that his innovations ignored the rights of the home and prepared pupils for a life of social regimentation rather than one of intelligent individualism. Bloodhounds thought they detected a vague scent of communism. Public furor and the failure of a bond issue to implement the new program led to the superintendent's resignation. The wild debates brought out the clear issue: to what extent is the younger generation to be subject to the "educational experts"; what, if anything, shall the home and the rest of society have to say about educational policies, the curriculum, etc.? This is not a new issue, by any means.The question is always being asked: "Who tells the teacher what to teach?" The school and the home are not always at peace, although society must of necessity charge the school with the responsibility for education of the child.