2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02871303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of heavy metal contamination on microbial biomass and community structure in soils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The PCA showed a change in C substrate utilization patterns in high Cd concentration treatments ( Fig.7), suggesting that the active members of the microbial community under Cd stress were different from those in the control soil (without external Cd loading). However, no significant changes in microbial community structure occurred in heavy metal contaminated soils as reported by Yang et al(2004). The major reason they provided was the strong binding between heavy metal and soil components, which decreased the bioavailability and toxicity of the added heavy metals.…”
Section: Changes In Microbial Community Diversitymentioning
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The PCA showed a change in C substrate utilization patterns in high Cd concentration treatments ( Fig.7), suggesting that the active members of the microbial community under Cd stress were different from those in the control soil (without external Cd loading). However, no significant changes in microbial community structure occurred in heavy metal contaminated soils as reported by Yang et al(2004). The major reason they provided was the strong binding between heavy metal and soil components, which decreased the bioavailability and toxicity of the added heavy metals.…”
Section: Changes In Microbial Community Diversitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Heavy metal pollution can cause shifts in the composition of microbial community (Li et al, 2006). DNA, phospholipids fatty acid (PLFA), and Biolog analyses are three commonly used analytical procedures for the evaluation of soil biological characteristics, and most of previous studies either used only one of the procedures to study the effects of Cd on microbial community structure (Muhammad et al, 2005;Renella and Mench, 2004), or focused on multiple heavy metal pollution (Yang et al, 2004). The difference in soil microbiological characteristics measured with only one method may not be reliable since the use of the other methods often leads to different interpretation of relative soil similarities (Widmer et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, an increasing awareness has emerged concerning the importance of microbial diversity in terrestrial ecosystems, and soil microbial community structure has also been considered as a biological indicator of heavy metal stress (Doelman et al, 1994;Pennanen et al, 1996;Liao Min et al, 2005). The microbial community structure is considered as one of the important parameters for soil ecosystem community structure and stability (Cai Xinde et al, 2006;Yang Yuangen et al, 2001;Yang Yuangen et al, 2004). Microbial community measurements based on phospholipid fatty acid (PLFA) composition allowed the detection of shifts in microbial composition in different soil types after short-and long-term heavy metal exposures (Frostegård et al, 1993).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available Pb in soil is related mainly to the soluble, exchangeable, carbonate-bound fractions, partly to the Fe-Mn oxide-bound fraction and organic-bound fraction, slightly to the residue form. Yang Yuangen et al (2004) reported that Pb was concentrated largely in the surface layer of soil, and the Pb concentrations tend to decrease with increasing depth. And Pb was present predominantly in the residue and Fe-Mn oxide-bound forms.…”
Section: Available Pb Concentrations Extracted By Different Extractanmentioning
confidence: 99%