2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2003.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of hand posture on preparatory control processes and sensory modulations in tactile-spatial attention

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

5
72
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(37 reference statements)
5
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such overlap is less likely (and therefore attentional selection can occur more rapidly) when hands are placed further away from each other and outward to the side, and least likely when the hands are positioned even further away from the front body midline, that is, close together behind the body. This would explain why the earliest effects of attentional selection between touch on the hands were found when the hands were placed close together behind the back (N80, the present study), followed by hands far apart behind the back (P100-N140, the present study) or in front (P100-N140, Gillmeister et al 2010;N140, Eimer et al 2004), and why later effects were found for hands close together in front of the body (N140, Eimer et al 2004;N200, Gillmeister et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Such overlap is less likely (and therefore attentional selection can occur more rapidly) when hands are placed further away from each other and outward to the side, and least likely when the hands are positioned even further away from the front body midline, that is, close together behind the body. This would explain why the earliest effects of attentional selection between touch on the hands were found when the hands were placed close together behind the back (N80, the present study), followed by hands far apart behind the back (P100-N140, the present study) or in front (P100-N140, Gillmeister et al 2010;N140, Eimer et al 2004), and why later effects were found for hands close together in front of the body (N140, Eimer et al 2004;N200, Gillmeister et al 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 48%
“…Allison et al 1989;De Santis et al 2007;Desmedt and Robertson 1977;Hari et al 1984;Mima et al 1998). Previous studies have shown effects of hand distance (Eimer et al 2004;Gillmeister et al 2010a) and of vision of the hands (Sambo et al 2009) on modulations reflecting transient attentional selection between the hands in the P100-N140 time range. In the present study, attentional effects at P100 and beyond were found irrespective of whether hands were close or further apart, however.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 3 more Smart Citations