2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevmaterials.3.054404
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of growth orientations and epitaxial strains on phase stability of HfO2 thin films

Abstract: The discovery of ferroelectricity in both pure and doped HfO 2 -based thin films have revitalized the interest in using ferroelectrics for nanoscale device applications. To take advantage of this silicon-compatible ferroelectric, fundamental questions such as the origin of ferroelectricity and better approach to controlled realization of ferroelectricity at the nanoscale need to be addressed. The emergence of robust polarization in HfO 2based thin films is considered as the cumulative effect of various extrins… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(96 reference statements)
2
56
1
Order By: Relevance
“…-1 with respect to the ground state) 39 39 and the films grown on Si(111) in the current work satisfy these conditions, and thus exhibit a polar r-phase (and not the low-energy o-phase). These observations, however, are quite contradictory to the theoretical predictions of Liu and Hanrahan 22 , possibly owing to the absence of the r-phases in their calculations. It must also be noted that films grown in (001) orientation in this work, show a preference for the o-phase, and not the r-phase.…”
Section: Polar R-phase Vs Polar O-phasementioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…-1 with respect to the ground state) 39 39 and the films grown on Si(111) in the current work satisfy these conditions, and thus exhibit a polar r-phase (and not the low-energy o-phase). These observations, however, are quite contradictory to the theoretical predictions of Liu and Hanrahan 22 , possibly owing to the absence of the r-phases in their calculations. It must also be noted that films grown in (001) orientation in this work, show a preference for the o-phase, and not the r-phase.…”
Section: Polar R-phase Vs Polar O-phasementioning
confidence: 58%
“…Such distinguishing characteristics 2 lead to an upsurge in application-oriented research as well as in curiosity-driven fundamental research to solve questions such as why these materials are capable of sustaining the unconventional ferroelectricity 13-32 , how these materials negate the effects of depolarization fields 33,34 , and whether such a new type of ferroelectricity can be replicated in other simple oxide systems.A prominent feature of hafnia-based materials is polymorphism 35 . While the ground state in the bulk HfO2 is a non-polar monoclinic (m-, P21/c) phase, a plethora of low-volume both polar and non-polar metastable states can be stabilized at ambient conditions via a combination of strategies such as cationic and anionic doping 1,[25][26][27]29,32 , thermal and inhomogeneous stresses 36,37 , nanostructuring 38 , epitaxial strain 16,20,22,23,26,29,[39][40][41][42] , and oxygen vacancy engineering 43,44 , all of which can be suitably engineered into thin-film geometries.Based on first-principles calculations 15,39,[45][46][47] at least five polar polymorphs (with space groups Pca21, Cc, Pmn21, R3 and R3m) can be identified as those that can be experimentally obtained.Owing to its relatively low energy, the orthorhombic (o-) Pca21 phase is widely observed in hafnia-based films grown via atomic layer deposition (ALD) 1,17,24,25 , chemical solution deposition (CSD) 28 , RF sputtering on Si 18,21 and pulsed-laser deposition (PLD) on selected substrates 19,23,26,31,[40][41][42] . A slightly higher energy rhombohedral (r-) phase (R3m or R3) has been recently observed on epitaxial Hf1/2Zr1/2O2 films grown on SrTiO3 (STO) 39 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the monoclinic (P2 1 /c, m-) phase is the bulk ground state, other low-volume metastable polymorphs such as the tetragonal (t-), cubic (c-) or orthorhombic (o-) phases are responsible for the various functionalities in these materials [19,20]. These are high temperature, high pressure phases in the bulk, which can be stabilized at ambient conditions via nanostructuring [21], doping [1,10,[22][23][24][25], oxygen-vacancy engineering [26,27], thermal stresses [28,29] and epitaxial strain [22,25,[30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37], all of which can be suitably factored into thin film geometries. In particular, ferroelectric behavior results from the metastable polar phases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this picture of phase transitions without the creation of a phase boundary, the transition rate would depend on the barrier height from the initial to the final phase. The energy landscape for the transition between the relevant phases and the transition states characterizing the height of the barriers have been calculated with and without 38 the inclusion of oxygen defects. 16 The results indicate that oxygen vacancies do not affect the height of the barrier significantly, but oxygen interstitial lowers the barrier of the metastable tetragonal phase or even completely removes this barrier towards the m-phase.…”
Section: Undoped Hfomentioning
confidence: 99%