2016
DOI: 10.1094/cfw-61-2-0059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Grinding Method on the Compositional, Physical, and Functional Properties of Whole and Split Yellow Pea Flours

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
63
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hammer‐milled pea flour starch damage ranged from 0.1% to 1.4% (Table ), which is comparable to starch damage values of the commercial sample (1.3%) and values for hammer‐milled pea flour (1.0%) reported previously (Maskus, Bourre, Fraser et al, ). Damaged starch in roller‐milled pea flour tends to be higher (2.8%) than it is in flour milled using other methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hammer‐milled pea flour starch damage ranged from 0.1% to 1.4% (Table ), which is comparable to starch damage values of the commercial sample (1.3%) and values for hammer‐milled pea flour (1.0%) reported previously (Maskus, Bourre, Fraser et al, ). Damaged starch in roller‐milled pea flour tends to be higher (2.8%) than it is in flour milled using other methods.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Median particle size and number of large particles were more affected by screen aperture size at 34 m/s than at 102 m/s. Maskus, Bourre, Fraser et al () and Maskus, Bourre, and Malcolmson () reported that the D10, D50, and D90 of hammer‐milled yellow split pea were 18, 249, and 559 µm, respectively, with a screen aperture size of 0.60 mm, while a screen aperture size of 1.19 mm resulted in D10, D50, and D90 values of 256, 726, and 1,323 µm, respectively. Rotor speed in this study was not specified, but the particle size distribution of the sample milled with the 0.60 mm screen aperture was comparable to results in the current study at 34 m/s rotor speed and a slightly larger (0.84 mm) screen aperture size (14, 203, and 620 µm, respectively).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The moisture content of lentil flours of various particle size varied between 7.3% and 9.6% with coarse flour having the highest moisture content compared to other flours. A recent study by Bourre et al (2019) showed that pulse flours milled using finer screens on the Ferkar mill had lower water absorption capacity; however, Maskus et al (2016) reported that finer flours tend to absorb more water due to their increased surface area and higher levels of starch damage. The protein content of the lentil flours varied from 26.8% to 29.0%, but no particular pattern could be observed with respect to particle size.…”
Section: Physical and Chemical Composition Of Raw Lentil Floursmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it should be noted that pulse flours can differ in their particle size based on the milling techniques adopted for grinding such as stone milling, hammer milling, roller milling, and pin milling along with the use of different size milling screens and/or by sieving flour through screens of different mesh sizes (Bourre et al, 2019;Canadian International Grain Institute, 2013;Maskus, Bouree, Fraser, Sarkar, & Malcolmson, 2016). However, it should be noted that pulse flours can differ in their particle size based on the milling techniques adopted for grinding such as stone milling, hammer milling, roller milling, and pin milling along with the use of different size milling screens and/or by sieving flour through screens of different mesh sizes (Bourre et al, 2019;Canadian International Grain Institute, 2013;Maskus, Bouree, Fraser, Sarkar, & Malcolmson, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%