2021
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-172896/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Green Cardamom Supplementation on Obesity and Diabetes Gene Expression Among Obese Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract: BackgroundPolycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is an endocrine disease in which related obesity, metabolic disorders and is considered as one of the main causes of infertility in women. This trial was investigated the effects of green cardamom on obesity and diabetes genes expression among obese women with PCOS.Methods194 PCOS women were randomly divided two groups: intervention (n= 99; 3 g/day green cardamom) and control groups (n=95). All of them were given low calorie diet. Anthropometric, glycemic and androgen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Their main texts were assessed. Ten articles were excluded; among them, in two articles, there was no sufficient data to include them in the final quantitative analysis (Mohadeseh Aghasi et al, 2018; Daneshi‐Maskooni et al, 2017), in four, no relevant outcome was presented (Aghasi et al, 2019; Cheshmeh et al, 2021; Daneshi‐Maskooni et al, 2019; Yaghooblou et al, 2015), and in four, the study was conducted on animals (Abu‐Taweel, 2018; Bhaswant et al, 2015; Kumari & Dutta, 2013; Rahman et al, 2017). Finally, eight articles were included in our meta‐analysis (Azimi et al, 2014; Azimi et al, 2016; Daneshi‐Maskooni et al, 2018; Fatemeh et al, 2017; Kazemi et al, 2017; Winarsi & Susilowati, 2018; Zahedi et al, 2021; Zahedi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their main texts were assessed. Ten articles were excluded; among them, in two articles, there was no sufficient data to include them in the final quantitative analysis (Mohadeseh Aghasi et al, 2018; Daneshi‐Maskooni et al, 2017), in four, no relevant outcome was presented (Aghasi et al, 2019; Cheshmeh et al, 2021; Daneshi‐Maskooni et al, 2019; Yaghooblou et al, 2015), and in four, the study was conducted on animals (Abu‐Taweel, 2018; Bhaswant et al, 2015; Kumari & Dutta, 2013; Rahman et al, 2017). Finally, eight articles were included in our meta‐analysis (Azimi et al, 2014; Azimi et al, 2016; Daneshi‐Maskooni et al, 2018; Fatemeh et al, 2017; Kazemi et al, 2017; Winarsi & Susilowati, 2018; Zahedi et al, 2021; Zahedi et al, 2022).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%