2008
DOI: 10.1657/1523-0430(07-035)[susiluoto]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Grazing on the Vegetation Structure and Carbon Dioxide Exchange of a Fennoscandian Fell Ecosystem

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Removal of aboveground part of plants, resulting in substantially less litter biomass accumulation in our plots (see Spence et al, 2014), is likely to have caused the decrease in ecosystem respiration in grazed plots. Similarly, other studies have shown that grazing reduced ecosystem respiration (Owensby et al, 2006; Susiluoto et al, 2008). While grazing typically reduces aboveground plant biomass, it can also increase belowground biomass (Sjögersten et al, 2012) or carbon allocation to roots (Hafner et al, 2012), and thus increase labile carbon input into soil (Gao et al, 2009; Hafner et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Removal of aboveground part of plants, resulting in substantially less litter biomass accumulation in our plots (see Spence et al, 2014), is likely to have caused the decrease in ecosystem respiration in grazed plots. Similarly, other studies have shown that grazing reduced ecosystem respiration (Owensby et al, 2006; Susiluoto et al, 2008). While grazing typically reduces aboveground plant biomass, it can also increase belowground biomass (Sjögersten et al, 2012) or carbon allocation to roots (Hafner et al, 2012), and thus increase labile carbon input into soil (Gao et al, 2009; Hafner et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The differences between individual studies may be due to different experiment and study designs and spatial scales. As far as we know, our estimate of the difference between the lichen biomass in the ungrazed and grazed sites is the largest observed among different studies to date (Väre et al 1996;Susiluoto et al 2008;Olofsson et al 2010;Köster et al 2013). The second highest difference was observed by Väre et al (1996) who reported that the lichen biomass in the ungrazed sites was nine-fold compared with the estimate in the grazed sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Depending on the ecosystem and grazing pressure, herbivory may either lead to an increase in net primary production (NPP) (Cargill and Jefferies 1984;Olofsson et al 2001Olofsson et al , 2004 or a decrease in NPP (e.g., Bagchi and Ritchie 2010;Beaulieu et al 1996;Cahoon et al 2012;Ouellet et al 1994;Sjögersten et al 2011;Susiluoto et al 2008; Van der Wal et al 2007). In nutrient poor high arctic areas a number of studies have shown an increase in NPP as a result of increased herbivory (Olofsson et al 2004; Van der Wal et al 2004) as nutrient addition by animal excrement can increase the labile nutrient level Van der Wal et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, studies of grazing in the high arctic have demonstrated that herbivory can result in a shift in vegetation composition-towards being more herb and graminoid dominated (Cahoon et al 2012;Olofsson et al 2009;Ouellet et al 1994;Post and Pedersen 2008;Sjögersten et al 2008;Susiluoto et al 2008;Van der Wal 2006). Grazing has also been shown to change nutrient allocation patterns, as vegetation uses carbon and nutrients reserves for regrowth of new plant shoots instead of building reserves below-ground (Beaulieu et al 1996;Chapin 1980;Green and Detling 2000;Mulder 1999).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%