2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.bpc.2010.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of glycerol and urea on micellization, membrane partitioning and solubilization by a non-ionic surfactant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To improve the performance and properties of the alkyl ethoxylate surfactant solutions, various additives such as alcohols [18][19][20] , inorganic salts 19,21 , and sugars 22 are commonly used as solution additives to the pure surfactant solution. Perhaps the most frequently used additives are aliphatic alcohols as they can act as cosurfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To improve the performance and properties of the alkyl ethoxylate surfactant solutions, various additives such as alcohols [18][19][20] , inorganic salts 19,21 , and sugars 22 are commonly used as solution additives to the pure surfactant solution. Perhaps the most frequently used additives are aliphatic alcohols as they can act as cosurfactants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the increasing body of literature on protein-detergent interactions; on the complex effects of cosolvents such as urea on the intrinsic curvature, order, and packing of detergents and phospholipid bilayers (60); and on the impact of natural membrane components on stability, future studies of TMD stability should be informed and facilitated by a greater understanding of protein-solvent interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For 1.0 mol�kg -1 urea, increases the cmc of AMT, 14-E2-14, and AMT+14-E2-14 mixed systems more as compared to 0.5 mol�kg -1 urea, hence the negative DG � mic value of AMT, 14-E2-14, and AMT+14-E2-14 mixed systems in the presence of 0.5 mol�kg -1 urea is higher. The addition of urea changes the bulk phase properties making it more favorable than the aqueous system for amphiphilic monomers [50], therefore, the movement of the hydrophobic chain from the bulk phase toward the micellar region is become less favorable, and hence the value of DG � mic becomes less negative. Furthermore, the obtained DG � mic value can be incorporated into the standard Gibbs energy of adsorption (DG � ad ) at the interfacial surface to evaluate their values for neat and mixed systems by means of the equation given below [51,52].…”
Section: Thermodynamic Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%