1996
DOI: 10.1016/0168-3659(96)01371-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of GLIADEL® wafer initial molecular weight on the erosion of wafer and release of BCNU

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
36
0
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…First, it is reasonable to assume that the volume of the polymeric implant remains constant over the course of diffusion since the system delivers drug prior to any significant degradation. 17 The simplified models were also able to effectively characterize carmustine distribution over the majority of the disk's initial drug delivery period. 15,16 Compared with the 6 to 8 weeks for the polymeric disk to completely degrade, 23 the implant should experience little to no volume change during the estimated 30 days it takes for the polymer to deliver 90% of its payload.…”
Section: Discussion On the Limitations Of Simple Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, it is reasonable to assume that the volume of the polymeric implant remains constant over the course of diffusion since the system delivers drug prior to any significant degradation. 17 The simplified models were also able to effectively characterize carmustine distribution over the majority of the disk's initial drug delivery period. 15,16 Compared with the 6 to 8 weeks for the polymeric disk to completely degrade, 23 the implant should experience little to no volume change during the estimated 30 days it takes for the polymer to deliver 90% of its payload.…”
Section: Discussion On the Limitations Of Simple Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective diffusion coefficient for transport through the polymer was empirically determined to be 6.7 × 10 −10 cm 2 /s, a reasonable value for a small-molecule drug in Polifeprosan 20. Dang and coworkers 17 also noted that in vivo studies of carmustine release from normal rat brains showed a linear relationship between the cumulative drug release rate and the square root of time for approximately the first 10 h after implantation. In summary, the above equations can be applied to describe the drug release of carmustine from Gliadel wafers during early times when the drug is released primarily by diffusion through the polymer matrix.…”
Section: Drug Release From a Monolithic Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wafers are composed of a degradable, polymeric matrix of 1,3-bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)propane and sebacic acid in a 20 to 80 molar ratio loaded with 7.7 mg carmustine [9]. Combined with tumor resection and radiation therapy, the GLIADEL® wafers increased patient survival by approximately two months and are a current standard of care for brain tumor patients [10].…”
Section: Surgical Excision Radiation Therapy and Chemotherapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Measuring the release of hydroxycamptothecin involved placing a hydroxycamptothecin-loaded polymer disc into a vial with 10 ml of 0.1 M phosphate-buffered saline containing 1% sodium dodecyl sulfonate (SDS), pH 6.5, and incubating at 37˚C [10]. The solution was removed at various time points and replaced with fresh buffer, and the recovered solution was assayed for the presence of hydroxycamptothecin by high-pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC).…”
Section: Assays Of Hydroxycamptothecin Release From Polymersmentioning
confidence: 99%